OU blog

Personal Blogs

Stylised image of a figure dancing

Sociopathy

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Wednesday 1 October 2025 at 16:05

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell -caldwell' to eliminate caldwell returns (take note of the position of the minus sign) or 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser.

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile  four highly stylised people facing each other. One is red.  Mental Health

[ 4 minute read ]

As we move towards The World Mental Health Day on the 10th October this year, I thought I might offer snippets on what shape mental ill health may take.

Sociopathy

'Sociopathy is a form of ASPD, characterized by a lack of empathy, disregard for others and persistent breaking of rules' - https://health.clevelandclinic.org/sociopath-personality-disorder

APSD is Anti-Social Personality Disorder. The most obvious symptom is 'having a consistent disregard for the rules and rights of others' (Cleveland Health Clinic). These people are not evil or mad or dangerous by default. I have a neighbour who has APSD. He rides his motorbike sensibly in built-up areas. Being young, he exhibits behaviour consistent with being young (such as he lacks experience in some things; he is trying new things; he is trying to find out where he fits in),  so being able to recognise that he has a mental illness is beyond almost everyone who is not a mental health clinician. My GP refers people who profess to having mental illness to a mental health team. She is not confident that she can diagnose someone as evil because they get in trouble with the law a lot. 

The Cleveland Health Clinic website goes on to say '“Sociopath” is an outdated, harmful term once used to describe someone who’s been diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD).'

They go on: '...nearly all signs of this condition involve significant, consistent and persistent disregard for other people.'

  • Strong disregard for social norms, laws or rules at home, at work, in school and other public places
  • Violating the rights of others
  • Minimizing others’ feelings and how they affect other people
  • Chronic manipulation, gaslighting, denial and deceit
  • Difficulty forming healthy relationships
  • Callousness and lack of remorse
  • Acting impulsively without concern for consequences
  • Attempting to gain power and control through aggression
  • A tendency toward petty crime, physical violence or fighting
  • Substance misuse

Like I said, a teenager who falls in with the wrong crowd.

Realistically though, the key thing to be aware of is, their behaviour must be 'significant, consistent and persistent'. Thankfully, even though I question reality, I do it from a position of trying to get a better understanding of reality. I also have a difficulty in forming healthy relationships. PTSD will make sure that the sufferer trusts no-one not to hurt them or to suddenly physically fall apart in instances of combat. 

A distinction can be made between PTSD as a result of domestic violence by a spouse, partner, sibling or parent, wherein the sufferer draws away from what may well be future beneficial relationships for them; and someone who due to having consistent disregard for others, acts impulsively, and is callous and remorseless, may have ASPD (Anti Social Personality Disorder). I think that someone with PTSD is the victim of someone who attempts to gain control and power through aggression, and is not the instigator of it. Indeed, there are many people who attempt to gain control with passive-aggression, as in 'I am right; You should think like me or you are wrong.' My brother would publicly ridicule my naivety to make a comparison to his three years more experience. Essentially, he got the support of a group to shore up his claims of superiority.

Let's face it; if you only have conversations within your own social group of people who only believe in the one and same thing, it is pretty easy to think everyone else is wrong. Thankfully, I only ever say what I think and never back it up with what someone else thinks. I don't overwhelm with numbers. 

When my neighbour with ASPD punched me in the face because I told him he nearly knocked me over on his moped, he didn't care. He acted impulsively and lashed out without thinking of the consequences. He was attempting to gain control using aggression. Another neighbour came along and told me that nobody likes me. I had only been living in my road for six weeks. What she was trying to do was gaslight me with passive-aggression, by trying to persuade me that because the majority have a singular opinion, then my perception of reality must be wrong. She showed a symptom of Anti-Social Personality Disorder. But, she doesn't consistently do this, or even persistently.

So, if I hear that someone has Anti-Social Personality Disorder I am first going to try to imagine what this person's goal is, and how do they shape their behaviour to get it. I am not going to think they are monsters of deception. The likelihood, if we apply only what we are told about people with ASPD is that anyone I meet with ASPD can't act in a consistent way to ever reach a goal anyway. That is plainly not true. While their behaviour and inclination to disrupt may inhibit their own progress we have to allow that every one of us exhibits something in the list above in greater and lesser degrees at different times of our lives, including before our first cup of coffee in the morning; after a divorce; or when we are stressed like immediately before an exam.

I suggest, that we be aware that pretty much all mental illness has crossovers in behaviour and attitude.

I invariably find that it is the person pointing the finger at someone else that is the most interesting person in the room. I find that they are trying to distract people from focusing on themselves. But Why? 

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Only good for processing

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 9 September 2025 at 08:46

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell' or 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser. 

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile

[ 9 minute read ]

Only good for processing

The blackberry bushes, more a hedge really, along the road to the next village are liars. But they are super-good at reproducing. Not that I have found their offspring. The fruit looks great and there is, if I wanted to pick them, probably a whole bucketful ready to be picked. They don’t taste good, like the ones in my garden, and they are full of mature seeds. Practically inedible to humans, unless they are swallowed whole or unless a stick is used to dislodge the seeds from one’s teeth. Even the birds are wise to this and look skeptically at them. I never see any near the bushes, and as I say, there is a lot of fruit.

Most of the people I know in the village won’t pick these berries because they are only a pavement away from the traffic on the road. I suppose there might be less than three hundred vehicles a day passes them. What a waste. If I buy a sieve I could make wine I think, because the only useful derivative of them would be a blackberry juice that could be fermented. I don’t have a demi-john though.

I have just described most of my memories. Almost every one of them is barbed and shaded. I do have some good and clean memories of my children but in the main, all the others are stained and tainted by awkwardness and strife. I overlay the difficulty I had over the course of a event or circumstance. One might imagine casting mould over ripe fruit as being a good way of seeing what I do to my memories, but all my memories look good on the outside, or at first glance. It is the exploration of them that reveals the bitter seeds that make them unpalatable. I could be wrong in the process of how I perceive my memories. I could be sitting in a private cinema and the screen shows a happy time with good lighting and everything to a secret observer looks fine, but I throw a dark veil over my head and look only through that. I think there are two ways to overview this: There might not be any shadows in the scenes. It might be that I can read the meta-data for the 'film' now and see it all simultaneously, or it is already woven into the recording. I am beginning to think I am darkening my memories with leaching of my current sorrow, rage, and regret.

But I am not morose or depressed. I am merely processing my thoughts from a somewhat objective standpoint. I am trying to understand how I live the weird home-life that I do; how things that seem to matter to my neighbours and the world around me are merely gimcracks and gewgaw objects, and exercises of futility to me.

When I went to school for the first time, I wouldn't eat at school for three weeks. Just how significant that is, is outside of my ability to understand maternal deprivation at such a young age. Millions of people can say the same about how their child was unhappy going to school for the first time. I saw a little girl a few years ago, in an early September, hiding from the other kids who were laughing and playing in the playground. She was quietly keening. I knew exactly why. She just wanted to go home. At least, I think I know that. Of course, I summoned a playground monitor person. I soon blended in at school, but not before the school tried to stop me crying in class by making, first my sister sit with me, and then my brother when I still wouldn't stop crying. I remember my brother sitting with me when I was, I suppose five then. We sat right at the front of the class and he sat on my left. And, I remember me crying.

There is a whole story of a deliriously happy childhood that played out in parallel to horror, fear and psychological inner torture, that is my young past. I remember a good bit of it, and could easily write a book, if I was inclined to do so. I am not going to though. I don't want to fall down a well of self-pity. I would rather cherry-pick memories to add as special ingredients to how I process the world around me today. 

I have been homeless, deliberately so. I am resourceful and I am assured of it with memories of success by my own hand. I hitch-hiked to Greece to pick oranges in the European Winter; lying on frozen ground with no kip-mat and no tent, in minus 10 degrees Celsius (14 F.). Truth be told, most of the time, I didn't care if I died. I got hypothermia years later outside of Amien, France, doing a similar thing. You really don't want that!

It is not surprising to me that I have no washing machine; that I hand-wash all my clothes and bedding. It is not surprising to me that I have only recently acquired a fridge-freezer after having no cooling apparatus for over a decade. I know that warm weather spoils food, but I also know when it is spoiled and how to slow the spoiling down without refrigeration. I know what food to eat and what I can safely store and carry in a rucksack. It is not surprising to me that I have pitched a tent near to where I have started a job a long way from home, and only gone home for the weekends until I could save enough to own motorised transport. I learnt to do all this; live without luxuries when I was in my twenties and was already independent from the age of sixteen and working in Germany at age seventeen. Incidentally, I spend, on average, in the Summer months, £46.19 on electric for a 31 day month. You might not be surprised if I look at lamenting people with some skepticism. In Winter, I spend about £150 per month on electric. There is no gas supply to my home.

I live as though I am in the film, 'A Quiet Place'; the 2018 American post-apocalyptic horror film with aliens in it that have superb hearing and snatch anyone who makes the slightest noise. I live in a maisonette above someone else. I have learnt to move quietly and to be gentle in all my movement. I have little rubber cushions on all the kitchen cupboard doors to prevent them making a noise if I am a bit clumsy. They, below me, tell me they can only hear me if I drop something. Making noise, to me, will attract something akin to the aliens in 'A Quiet Place'. For me, this is my older brother, crazy from drugs, alcohol and grief. I expect to get attacked despite him no longer being alive. It is not a ghost that will attack me now; it is my memory. I learnt to live quietly when I lived in a wood, even though I was practiced from living with my brother. I didn't want to disturb the wildlife. All the time, still, I am afraid of the listening aliens. Not real aliens; my brother. If someone else makes a noise I am frozen. I cannot stop your noise or my neighbour's noise. I irrationally think I am going to get attacked.

I have strong memories of living frugally and being fine with it. Today, I sleep on a mattress on the floor; I don't have cupboards or wardrobes for my clothes or a chest of drawers; I don't have a sofa or armchairs; I don't have a television; I don't have baths or showers, I boil a kettle and use a bucket and a cup while I kneel in the bath; I have no need to listen to music or fill silence with noise, and I especially despise social media. I do, however, have a good reason for shying away from regarding digital chit-chat as beneficial. 

A long time ago, even before WiFi and mobile phones, I lived, by myself, in a house in a beautiful village with a river running through it. I was at home when there was a power-cut. Everything went silent. It wasn't the silence of the air not being disturbed. It was an inner silence similar to hearing the fridge running and then it stops and there is quiet. I stress that this was an inner silence. It was like a cold drink on a hot day. My thoughts were clear. It was refreshing. It was like breathing out after holding my breath. Typically, I had no noisy devices running, like a radio or telly, so the shaking of the air had not changed. After about a minute, the power came back on. I felt it more rather than had any solid reason to know it. I can't remember how I knew the power had gone off, I must have had something electrical running. Yet, the overall feeling I had when it came back on, was of fuzziness. I went under the stairs and turned the electric off at the mains. It had no effect. I was working on the principle that a house is enveloped in a magnetic field due to the electric wires running throughout every room. There was no longer silence. There have been short power-cuts recently. There has never been silence; mobile phones.

I once got a prolonged electric shock of 110V. I heard the hum of the electric, before I managed to escape the contact. 

Because I remember that, and have experienced the silence of Ireland, I despise radio waves. Even my laptop gives off superfluous harmonics, I think. Of course, there is nothing I can do because you all have mobile phones. See what I mean; the joy of silence in my memory is spoiled by my resentful attitude towards modern persons, relentlessly chatting. It is not their fault, it is mine. I am different, jaded by other people. I can despise you just because you are sociable. But I won't let you be sociable in my mind. I instead regard people as dopamine addicts, and feeble in their own esteem. I am not a nice person. I am mean and not at all charitable. 

Of course, I understand that someone brought up with being driven to school in a Rolls Royce would absolutely NEED to be surrounded by luxury as an adult to feel only normal. It is all relative. I grew up running around a three acre garden with animals everywhere. But all that is seared out of me. I know devastation; not like the devastation of wars. The devastation I know is a scribbling over my memories with graffiti using a permanent marker. Effectively, my upbringing both shapes the way I live and negates any enjoyment in the way I live. So, I can, with some effort, sympathise with many lamenting people who feel they cannot afford food or electric, but I feel that there is a solution at the same time. It, unfortunately, isn't an acceptable solution. 

Taking a few moments to sift through some memories.

Isn’t it strange that fruit is so abundant that we, where I am, don’t even bother with it. Even the apples left outside of people’s gardens stays in the cardboard boxes unwanted by the dog-walkers and school-kids. I think the sour ones deserve a bite if only for the contrast to expectations and as a new experience.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

The lighthouse of my mind

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Sunday 7 September 2025 at 07:57

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell' or 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser. 

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile

[ 8 minute read ]

The lighthouse of my mind

After a while, being by myself gets weird. 

I can spend about two weeks without speaking a single word to someone or similarly being the focus of someone's words, otherwise known as social interaction, before I get a bit of an itch to engage with other people. I realise that many, many people, particularly in the modern environment of SmartPhones and social media will find that situation to be intolerable and may even feel that I am exaggerating my claim. I mean, how could I know how long I can go without human interaction before I need to take a sip of validation? I would have to have been isolated for many consecutive days, many times, to be able to come up with a reasoned understanding of my reliance on my own resources, wouldn't I? Well, I have, been isolated many times for many consecutive days, that is.

Of course, I am not totally isolated, because reading a fiction book is leaving myself on a shelf somewhere, and experiencing someone else's story instead. To be honest, I tend to go to the shop for supplies and usually talk to the shop keeper or his son. But, his son never really responds. He doesn't have his nose buried in his phone; he just doesn't really respond to me poking him with words.

Up until the last couple of days I was confused, even contemptuous of people who, to me, incessantly chatter. It seems to me that their minds are out of gear. About two years ago, someone asked me about how I like conversation to be, and I replied, 'It has to have structure.' I have been an employer and while on a job the discourse would be largely me co-ordinating work in real-time. However, one customer, at her home, asked me and one member of staff, 'How long have you two known each other?' I recognised then that my staff member and I had been rapping; not in rhyme, just a constant back and forth while we worked. We knew what to do, and knew how each of us would do it, which freed us up to just freewheel.

Looking back at that I realise how good that felt. I was relaxed. Doing something that required constant attention while engaged in coasting conversation was satisfying.

However, today I am bemused by just how needy I find people to be. I should qualify that. I find clues to how people publicly act in ways that seem to have a focus on finding validation of themselves. You might say that I am not qualified to judge other people and I am only drawing conclusions from snippets of information, but you would also have to recognise that I am cold and heartless, unlike you (probably). Of course, I am not really heartless, just lost, and so I don't necessarily engage emotions when I encounter the world. Primarily, my perception of new things is mostly unfettered by empathy. I see the structure and not the fabric of people. Indeed, if I am inclined to be interested, I have to switch on or shift my emotions to overlay my cold perception. Yes, I know. It sounds really harsh, but, I think nearly everyone does this, nearly all the time. I just know I do it. If you are driving and having a conversation within your vehicle, you probably don't care about the feelings of the driver behind when you brake hard for the empty parking spot you have just seen. That is inconsiderate. That is normal behaviour, unfortunately. Driving experience will slot in a realisation that you are about to get out of your car and there is an angry driver nearby. I consider the driver behind, let's just put it that way.

But, something I thought unfathomable seems to have become much clearer since my catharsis yesterday. I am glad that in understanding myself better I can understand others better. Sadly, I think I have uncovered something quite shocking to me (When I describe myself as cold and heartless I am only providing a base for my make-up. I can be shocked). In this case, I have found a hollowness; not dark, but lonely. Loneliness, I suggest is vast. It is a gigantic cave in which only the observer's voice echoes. I already know I am lonely but I have never really understood how to see the signs in other people, because almost nobody will stand up and outright say 'I am lonely.' It is stigmatised. Worse than that, I realise, it might not even be recognised by the 'sufferer'. So, I can understand why people will seek validation from others; complete strangers that they have no hope of ever meeting, online.

Three comments from a YouTube video asking who is listening

What is this image about? These are consecutive comments to, I think is a 1980s music video I briefly watched on YouTube. I can't remember which one, but I had been hovering around Yazoo at the time. Something I find interesting is that the comments are chronologically consecutive yet separated by months, and the content of the comments is interesting. Combined, these aspects paint a picture for me.

It is a 1980s music video; I accessed this video in the first week of September 2025; the timestamps for the comments are from February to July 2025; there are no intervening comments; and the question is the same, almost identical in fact.

The number of replies may be relevant but I will come to that in a bit.

Initially, I thought that they are comments from nostalgic persons who are revisiting their heyday experiences of synthesised, new wave music. That would make them about sixty-something years old. I suggest that around that age, many people are less socially malleable, and forming new friendships is more difficult than in their youth because they are no longer inclined to accept new perspectives that exist in strangers. So, I went on to imagine that there might be a slow but steady decline in social activity as school friendships wither, offspring move away to places that make random or daily physical contact difficult, and marriage partners are a bit more predictable than they once were. I have to guess all that because my life is not a suitable base for making parallels in thinking. I suppose people in their sixties use short phrases such as 'Who's listening.....' Don't they?

However, the person's age doesn't really matter. It is that they are, in my mind, asking for validation of their existence by hoping that people respond to them; their question. The question gives nothing away. it provides no information about the questioner. It is a highly efficient way to get people to recognise that the questioner exists. I might say that in normal and everyday conversations, no-one just listens and says nothing. We want to be heard. How then do people feel satisfied from people recognising they exist under the guise of knowing that other people are listening to the same piece of music? And then it hit me. At a real-life concert, someone might turn to a complete stranger and shout, 'They're great, aren't they?' The other person might say, 'Excellent'. Maybe I am at the BBC Proms with that. I don't feel comfortable using swearwords unnecessarily. But this isn't personal validation as being, tell me I exist by responding to me. This is forming a connection by looking for a response that says, 'We are alike.'

So, are the questions from people who are 'in the groove' or entranced, and are just expressing their enjoyment? No, I don't think so. They might be as such, but the question is really about numbers; how many? I suggest, the number of responses is relevant to the questioner. I suggest, that to the questioner one thousand responses would initiate a greater satisfaction than only a single response. I suggest, that because that is so, it is someone's ego that is displayed behind the questions. 

It is telling that the same question asked three times, in February, June and July 2025 gets less 'likes' and less actual written replies. I can't help thinking that if I was a teenager I would think the last questioner to be a 'saddo'. With that in mind, I blanked out the names in the image. But, I think, a teenager would be right to think that, as a veneer of thinking. For all I know there could be an experimenter at large. Perhaps the third questioner is gauging something.

Certainly, it seems that either July was a happier time to be outside than June and definitely February in the Northern Hemisphere, or people are thinking to themselves, when they see the last comment, 'Get a grip, that device for validation is thoroughly cooked by now, in fact it is burnt.'

Overall, the whole issue saddens me. I was going to write 'deeply' saddens me, but that well is already full, so, as a solute, it will not have any effect in me that I would be able to detect without significant effort. To be honest, because I am intrigued, it does change my thought processing. So, it saddens me to imagine that some people are so desperate for new connections that they will deliberately hang onto the coat-tails of creators, while exhibiting no creativity of their own, and offering nothing of themselves, just to be noticed. Unless, I am missing something, and the question is really a modern way of seeking responses that say, 'We are alike'. Which is validation of belonging to a group.

Personally, I would feel ashamed if I wrote those questions because there is nothing to applaud. But, of course, I am standing in a different place to these people, and to feel shame would mean that one is outside of oneself and recognising oneself, either deliberately or as a sudden and surprising epiphany. Of course, I also have a need to feel validated, but I really think if everyone said 'Good Morning' to me when I walk about, I would not feel any approbation for any talent or achievement, and so I would only recognise polite people, In fact, I would tire of it if the incidence of salutations went beyond, perhaps, twelve per hour. 

I don't in any way mean to disparage the questioners as losers, 'saddos' or cheapskates. Far from it. I am much more concerned with understanding why, to my understanding, such low level connections is something to be sought.

As I remember it, in The Sims, the digital dolls-house game, there is cheap, 'low-level comfort' furniture that gives a slow return for recuperation. It takes a long time to be refreshed. I am focused on why the questioners do not have deep and comfortable relationships that refresh them more fully than fleeting sips of anonymous connection. Are they top-ups? Do people really need top-ups? I suspect it is really a want rather than a need, unless there is, of course an addiction to dopamine, and the anticipation of a response triggers that dopamine. But, if that is true, then I am saddened that people are acting no differently to a rat in a laboratory. Am I so different? I think so. 

Continuing with the furniture theme. If we sit all day, even on an uncomfortable chair, so we are always topping up, the comfortable armchair at home is not something we cherish and long for. We won't seek it, simply because we don't value it as much as someone who stands all day and then, in returning home, slips off their shoes and sinks into deep and surrounding comfort. I might suggest that the chairs are icons representing relationships. I will always desire an armchair but only require a wooden chair that offers little comfort, so I can continue to function; that is why I am resilient and why I never top-up. To me, it is empty and time-consuming. 

.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Detached Emotions

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 16 September 2025 at 07:51

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell' or 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser. 

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile

[ 12 minute read ]

Detached Emotions

In 2012, I took a long look at myself and recorded what I found. Fortunately, I saved it, and it is reproduced here, unadulterated, or rather, unaltered. I chose 'unaltered' over 'unadulterated' because this is raw, rude me. It was never intended for publication. But much of it is residual in me, and I am ruthless with myself. After it, I have briefly interviewed myself in a pretend studio as though my 2012 statement is a video statement, with questions I ask myself today, such as what did I mean, and how have I changed or adapted.

four highly stylised people facing each other. One is read and the others are black. PTSD and Detached Emotions (raw speech)

'I suppose, straightaway, I should make myself clear in that my view on how I want to be approached by other people may be distorted by a certain degree of misanthropy as a culmination of a series of bad relationships stemming from my early childhood through adulthood to the present day.

The prevailing thought I consciously hold when considering the world about me is this: Stay away from me; do not get in my space; definitely don't bore me with your mundane words about your everyday lives; all you want to do is massage your own ego, to stimulate your mental processes or otherwise gain something from an encounter with me. What makes it worse for me is that these people don't even realise why they are talking to me. They think they are being friendly when they are actually sub-consciously establishing an hierarchy; checking out whether I am dangerous or can be dominated. This thought is in no way limited to any individual, or group, religion, creed or colour nor is it dependent on gender, looks, ability, race, health, wealth or intelligence. This thought is the result of empiricism and, in my view, has been tested and proved countless times. Another way of saying it is for me to say 'I do not directly require you or anything you possess; you do not have anything I want and never will; I do not need or want your company, comfort, conversation, or opinion; I do not want your wealth, your food, your benevolence or pity'. Again, this is not directed toward any individual and certainly should not be taken personally if it causes alarm, concern or negative reaction. That is to say, it is directed towards everyone and no-one in particular.

The one thing I primarily want, need, fantasise about and crave is consideration. This is consideration for everyone, from everyone and by everyone. But most of all, CONSIDER THIS EVERYONE: I don't like you and I am not going to like you, because if you cause me to react, respond to you or otherwise force me to discover and develop a new set of rules just so I can make you happy enough to go away and leave me in peace, you will leave me feeling irritated, cheapened, used, and with a feeling that it is me who has been considerate, patient and empathic to your needs. Again, this extends to everyone and should not be taken personally.

My maxim for a fruitful life is: do not cause negative feeling in other people. This is the 'Golden Rule' with a slight change. Do not do to others what you would not want others to do to you. This maxim has negativity woven into it, though it is controlled and purposeful, to avoid negativity caused by doing to someone what you want them to do to you. After all, how can we be sure what others want? Is it the same as I want? I will leave that question there for fear that further exploration would leave me open to inquisitive persons asking me what I want and me having to adopt a pleasant, non-patronising mode of behaviour which hopefully would not induce a negative feeling in them and would still cause them to leave me alone and never approach me again without them ever knowing the truth about what I am really thinking, because, I fear that due to the human condition, their egos would enable them to override common-sense and make them believe that they would be doing me some service by offering me a biscuit or something.

They are probably generous, perhaps even kind; perhaps they find that reciprocal generosity in a symbiotic relationship works best for them and thus they subscribe to the original 'Golden Rule' of doing to others as you would want them to do to you….. I feel sorry for them because I shall never covet what they have or need their company, whereas, as humans, they probably feel the need to belong to a group, to exercise their existence in the many roles they play in the world; to indulge in mental stimulation through conversation (banal or otherwise) or have their egos stroked – all of which demand the attention of another person.

Sometimes, I take a reward or praise when I am offered it, not because I want it, I don't, no, solely because I think it helps people to think that we are getting on okay. I derive no pleasure in satisfying people's need for platitudes, if, indeed, that is what I am giving; I feel no superiority or pride; I am just relieved that for a while my future refusals to accept gifts or reward will not be perceived as an outward sign of wanting to be disconnected from others. Without a full understanding of me and without full insight into my life I feel that they would, like so many others, mistakenly take it as a personal snub.

I am not contemptuous of people who live symbiotic lives, not a bit, no, I am jealous that they have never had to develop coping strategies such as I have.

I am puzzled by complacence, irritated by complacence, which I believe is the product of what the Germans call 'gemutlichkeit' – 'comfortableness'; something I feel that I can never now achieve. Complacence, for me, is the attitude one may adopt if one feels there is nothing to worry about; or does not perceive imbalance. 'Learned helplessness' is its pathetic friend and is, to me, arrhythmia that is recognised by the individual but feeling that nothing can be done about it, so one fears but tolerates the consequences. Neither attitude is acceptable to me and I live in a constant state of searching for either escape routes or solutions that satisfy the situation, though not necessarily me. In real terms, this means to me; Fight tooth and nail using smiles and kid-gloves to attempt to achieve an unrealistic vision of peace (which even worse, provides only temporary succour) against people who would vindictively tear my guts out if I show my soft under-belly, simply because it is in their nature to do so.'

September 2025 (a real interview between me and myself, in a fictional studio having watched the video of 2012 me)

    

       'That was you in 2012. Pretty raw stuff. Thank you for sharing it, Martin. How do you feel seeing that today?'

       'Quite alarmed really, and disappointed. I had been like that for decades by then. I find it difficult to believe that I could be so cold. Yet, it is a defence mechanism that stems from an even darker place.'

       'You started by saying that people are merely massaging their own egos and that they are not friendly towards you; what did you mean?'

       'I think I had read somewhere that people are more stimulated by talking than by listening and so I thought that people are really talking at me, rather than to me. Of course, I desperately wanted to talk to people and then to talk to me. I wanted to explain how I felt and be understood. I wanted to hear what they are saying and understand how they felt. But I felt that no-one was letting me do that. I knew that it would be a long process to carefully open up to people, each and every time I met them. Unfortunately, I actually mean every time I met the same person, because as soon as I was away from any conversation I would unconsciously rebuild the wall. No-one was going to give me that much time or space; they have their own lives and thoughts to contend with. As I say, I wanted to know them, their thoughts, theirs and mine, but ultimately, all I ever heard was mundane chatter that masked their true identity. I was certain that the lightness of their words was never a reflection of how they felt, so to me, it was just rubbish that they would endlessly spout simply because they were mentally stimulating themselves.....at my expense.'

       'Do you think that perhaps many of the people you encountered then were not as troubled as you thought; that you might have been projecting yourself on them?'

       'I am not sure I was projecting myself onto others any more than everyone else. I was absolutely certain that I was seeing the world through a dark lens but it was a lens that was made up of my perception of other people. That is why it was so important for me to understand other people and how they dealt with emotional pain. My world completely stopped when I was twelve. I was emotionally catatonic then. Like every child, I was supposed to learn from my surroundings and my peers. I had no chance to emotionally recover from my breakdown because I had a brother who would vindictively remove any opportunity for me to feel safe. It is as though he saw me as a threat to his superiority and felt he must reduce me to a helpless mess. This meant that as I grew I was only able to learn from my environment with no emotion attached to it. Everything about me is a construct, a careful fabrication of social etiquette and conversation; all without emotion. I heard only words not feelings. This was borne out in places where I stumbled, such as not recognising a hint, I still can't.' In 2012, I saw myself as a mirror to everyone else. I did not see myself as an individual person, only you, and you, and you contained in me. However, because there was no emotion there was never an ebb and flow in relationships; never moments of quiet. I just wanted more information with which to program myself.'

       'You eshewed gifts and rewards. Can you tell me why?'

       'Many people only give gifts at specific times; birthdays, Christmas....I recognised this while still in my teens. Most of us do. Because giving gifts and rewards generally is an emotional outsource, there is an expectation that emotion is reciprocated. Of course, I was not able to do that. Someone could have given me a brand new car and my reaction would have been the same as if I was given a banger. It was only the practical aspect of gifts and rewards I saw then. By 2012, I would have been pleased to be able to drive and not walk but that emotion would never be directed towards a gift-giver; it would only be realised in actually using the vehicle. Nonetheless, gift-givers would expect me to show gratification. Worse still, like most people, they would expect a reciprocation in kind. I simply could not understand why. I deliberately did not celebrate my twenty-first birthday. Many people regard the attainment of that age as seminal. But, it is no longer the attainment of majority as it once was. So, in my mind, by 2012, having not celebrated any birthdays or Christmas's since age eighteen, my idea of reciprocal gift-giving was pretty well shrivelled. I didn't know how to respond if someone even offered me a biscuit or a cup of tea. I had to have protocol for accepting anything. I would always refuse it twice and only accept if there was a third offer. By the third offer I would be feeling so uncomfortable that I would have to accept. Put upon really. I recognised that the offerer is feeling uncomfortable because I won't accept their hospitality. Looking back, I suppose I was insulting them. EVERYONE accepts their offerings and has a chat, why not me? they were asking themselves.  I was compelled to eat a biscuit, drink tea, or accept reward for doing a chore for them. I just wanted to be left alone in that emotional department. To me it was a form of bullying, but to them it is a ritual part of connecting.'

       'You said you are not contemptuous of people who live symbiotic lives. Can you elaborate on that?'

       'Ah ha. Hmmm. Most people are not going to like what I am about to say. These days i can put myself outside of myself and to some extent look at myself from how someone else might perceive me. I am not sure I really want to be honest with you now. It is uncomfortable for me right now. However, one of the most important things I promised myself that I would do, because I understand I am fundamentally flawed and will always be, is to be honest, to be honourable and to have integrity, no matter what the cost to myself. It is imperative I do not knowingly cause harm due to something I have overlooked in myself, so honesty is my safeguard...... I was contemptuous of other people who need symbiotic relationships in 2012, and I still am. I can't do that. It is completely absent in my make-up to be able to trust anyone with anything. I was practically orphaned at age sixteen and my legal guardian was a drug and alcohol crazed older brother. I grew up with an independence that I hold hard to my heart. I won't ever let go of it. I can't. It is my shield. It saves me from you and them and her. I regard seeking help from others as weak. Collaboration, to me, is a signal that someone is inadequate. Symbiosis, of course, is living among each other in a mutually beneficial way. All of how I felt in 2012 is residual in me today. It will never be displaced with something else. It can only be tempered. I will never know love, like you know love, because love came to me from a crying mother. I have to accept that I am ruthless but mostly polite and respectful. Yet, I must also understand that my ruthlessness extends also to myself; I let it, because it is only fair. I will not allow myself to solely cast contempt on the world, because in reality I am contemptuous of myself. But, it is true to say, I only see people in three aspects, beneficial to me, in the way, or as a non-playable character in a video game, as being entirely neutral and just part of the scenery.'

       'Yet, you do subscribe to symbiosis.'

      'Of course. I am not unkind. I understand that people are unaware of much around them. Someone who gets up, cheerful, and walks towards the bus stop doesn't want to meet ruthless and contemptuous me. When they call 'Good Morning' to me, I would have a terrible day of guilt if I did not return it, as cheerily as I can, even though most of the time I am acting. It would break my heart to know that someone vicariously suffers because they meet me. I don't have a filing system for emotions or a box in which to neatly to place them. At any time one will jump out at me and I will cry. But it is not crying for the present, It is crying for the past. No-one wants that on the way to the bus-stop, so I have a personality I present to the world. It is of course, wooden, but it includes trying to give people want they need as though we are in a symbiotic, though brief relationship.'

       'Would it be fair to say, Martin, that today, if you are completely honest with yourself, you are jealous?.'

       'Of course. Hugely.'

       'Martin Cadwell. Thank you.'

If you like music and would like a musical representation, one that I think matches, of how I was feeling prior to being able to break myself down again and resemble some of the pieces in a semblance of order and understanding in 2012, you might consider listening to the Album 'My Life in the Bush of Ghosts' by Brian Eno and David Byrne, released in 1981.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Temporary Problem

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Friday 5 September 2025 at 07:02

silhouette of a female face in profile

Unfortunately, I am experiencing some difficulty in being confident that the creativity in my posts will not be high-jacked. I carefully craft a scene with contrasts and surprises only to have the 'tyres on my bicycle' subsequently deflated. In some way, this acts as a 'spoiler' and my PTSD is triggered. I feel bullied. I deliberately leave out content for the reader to have some space for thought. However, the energy is subsequently being sapped or tapped.

I write posts as a hobby that I can do by myself. It allows me to explore myself through creativity. However, I feel undermined lately. If I make a poor clay facsimile of a figure and I am proud of it, I don't want someone subsequently describing the clay or the process or how the light falls on it.

Until I can safeguard my safe area, in which I can play, I shall not be able to fully enjoy the experience of writing. It is the predators that haunt me most; they sit and wait for something alive and tasty to digest and then regurgitate it, leaving only carrion where once there was life. It is precisely that type of person who cemented PTSD in me.

I share myself and how PTSD affects me. Every post I write is shaped by that mental illness. It is extremely personal, but also cathartic. I completely and absolutely do not want a fly in the ointment. I am not writing in the past. I write as the healing process continues, as I become more confident.

I feel that the clay I am moulding is pierced with someone else's pain.

Permalink
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Better Interaction with the world

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 16 September 2025 at 07:52

I have decided that I have been neglecting my neighbours. I am usually not prepared to stop and chat with them as I whizz past on my bicycle. They wave from their cars and smile at me and I barely glance at them. Very recently though, I have come to realise that my stand-offish attitude is sub-standard for my village. I don't live in a cold and sterile environment bereft of human interaction. I live down a lane where people stop and pick blackberries next to a pasture. The birds sing, children laugh and dogs bark. My world is full of fun and happiness, of kindness and concern. It has people who care about other people, who help each other. I live in a village in which one neighbour cuts another's hedge. People here are not afraid of each other. We don't look away when a teenager is in trouble, or a dog is pining for its owners while they are at work. We don't selfishly pass by if a car battery has run down overnight and the car won't start on a winter morning. People talk to each other at the bus stop.

One of my shopkeepers spent a long time helping me to understand Buddhism to help me with a TMA, while the other helps me to understand the flavours of the Asian foods he sells, and he introduces me to new products. I make him tarts from the, to me, strange flavours, with my own twist on them. My village interacts in a fruitful way. I borrowed a neighbour's ladder and he borrowed my car to take his mum to hospital. Yet, still, I can do more. When I bought Art Supplies and left them outside my house for young mums, teenagers and the elderly to take, I carelessly thought I had done my bit. Now, I can remember that one of my neighbours said, when she stopped in her car to read my sign, "I must do that for my church." I am glad that I am inspirational but saddened that I did not immediately offer to help her implement it, or offer to give advice on Art.

I realise it is a cruel and selfish man who will find an excuse to never offer help. I realise now, that it is a broken man with a hard heart that will ignore another person; to have no will to engage, other than to make a conscious effort to undermine. I know when I see these types, because that is how I got part of my PTSD. My PTSD is a vicarious one. It was brought about by narcissism and psychopathy in one part, and by the direct effect of World War Two on one of my parents who suffered at the hands of an officer in the Sturmabteilung (S.A.) in another part. 

I vow never to be selfish or mean or jealous and critical of others, or feed off other people like a parasite, or piggy-back off their efforts. In fact, I have a reminder on my wall: 'Rare is the person who can weigh the faults of others without putting his thumb on the scales' - Byron J Langenfeld (World War One aviator). I will however, paint pictures of how I see things. I am not a writer and never will be. I am alive. My eyes are not stones and my ears are not closed.

I am pleased to discover that I am alive, that my PTSD does not shut me off from people as much as it could and once did. I was once entirely numb. I am not bitter. I forgive the people who hurt me. i am not jealous; I want people to succeed. I am pleased that I have grown and can find some peace where there was only isolation. I am pleased that my neighbours have admiration for me and the feeling is reciprocated. 

I am pleased that I have original ideas. I am pleased that I can invent shops and shopkeepers and streets and churches and people and cars and ladders and leaves as I please. I am glad that I do not have to.

One of the reasons I made money as an artist instead of a photographer is because I wanted to be able to add or subtract from a scene. I wanted to embellish or attenuate at will. I wanted to throw paint on a canvas and think that looks like a dolphin, I will go with that! I am pleased that I can make contrasts to act as a background to how I really feel. I am pleased I have an outlet. My world is not black with no light. It is not bleak with no hope of approbation. My world is colourful with no need for approbation. I am having fun.

Permalink
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Can't quite make it out. Can you hear me?

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 16 September 2025 at 07:53

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell' or 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser. 

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile

[ 9 minute read ]

Title and content inspired by 'In My Room' by Yazoo on their debut studio album, 'Upstairs at Eric's' released in 1982 by Mute Records. four stylised people facing each other Mental Health warning. DO NOT listen to this album if you suffer from even mild psychosis (specifically the song 'I before e except after c'). 'In My Room' is mildly okay though.

Can't quite make it out. Can you hear me?

In 1970, 'Your Song', written by Elton John and Bernie Taupin, was released. The first two lines are:

It's a little bit funny
This feeling inside 

That is what comes to mind when I make the routine morning checks on myself today. They are quite automatic and perfunctory and no-one has to suit up in a haz-chem or space suit. I also run a program that checks mental acuity as well. You know, a bit like in one of those films where there is a bored someone in an observatory who suddenly notices an anomaly in the sky and they sit up and intently look or listen.

Of course, Elton John was singing about someone else from his perspective, and I, today, am making mental and physical checks on myself. The reason why the first two lines of his fine song are prominent in my mind is because I am not unwell in the immediate sense; more as an overall curtailing of 'me'.

I live in a village with a Post Office and shop and, lucky me, there is another village one and a half miles away with a Post Office and shop. My village shop is run by a very kind Sri Lankan man, who took over the lease quite recently. He is a Tamil. The next village Post Office and shop, one and a half miles away, is also run by a very friendly Sri Lankan man. Actually, he is just friendly now. He used to be waggy-tail friendly.

The differences between these two men and how they run their shops is legion. I have some qualifications in marketing and customer service and so have at least one eye open on how things are going. My local shop is run like there is a frenzied attempt to see what works at the cost of neatness. We have all seen them, and many of us have them as their local shop; hand-written prices, half empty boxes in the aisle that is least used, a broken down fridge, Asian foods in the freezer, and here is where my focus is; unsold stock. We'll come back to that.

The village shop run by, I suppose, his Sri Lankan competitor, one and a half miles away, actually has a canny wife's influence attached to it. I have never noticed any trip hazards and there have never been any hand-written prices (there ARE no published prices). it has recently expanded from a tiny, and exceedingly cramped, well, just a Post Office, into a snaking convenience store. There are high-end frozen meals (COOK) and all the usual commodities one might find in a rather small, but local, English convenience store. They are vegetarian Buddhists.

Quite understandably, these two shop-keepers do not see eye to eye. Older people might immediately associate the word 'Tamil' with 'Tiger'. Let's just say, In the 1980's, some Ceylon Tamil militants hoping to create a separate Tamil state in the north and north east, conducted a guerilla war against the Sinhalese government in Sri Lanka. My nearest shopkeeper is Tamil, an omnivore, and the next nearest shopkeeper, one and half miles away, is Sinhalese. Fun! I will explore! Yeah, I know, I am snacking on other people's tension and strife. I don't have a television, so I can't watch soaps, and the tension is already there any way. I am fascinated by how moods change and how faces tell what words belie. I now feel like a little boy pulling legs off spiders and cooking ants with a magnifying glass. Maybe I should break the stick with which I poke wasp nests.

With the contrasts in place:

Recently, I have consolidated a good relationship with my local shop-keeper in that he doesn't suspiciously watch me wander through the shop. Yes, the stereotypical suspicious Asian shop-keeper. Why would he watch me? As I said, he is kind. The previous shopkeepers would just throw away the out of date stuff. This chap lets customers take it for free. He directly competes for custom with a standard convenience store for, you know, British stuff. 

Here lies a slight problem. The quality of the food in my local shop is pretty low. It seems that my shopkeeper thinks we will buy cheap products at the expense of our health. That attitude is so last 1980s. Oh, how does one say something without being derogatory? Think housing estates wherein one might expect to run into pregnant teenage single mothers holding bottles of cider, who buy cakes that cost less than two quid, and cars that need their exhausts fixed, driven by uninsured drivers. A lot of Britain was like that in the 1980s. Perhaps, I could say my shopkeeper is nostalgic for the 1980s, instead of blinkered to the affluence of my local area.

The reason my shopkeeper does not watch me on his CCTV monitor is because I always offer to pay for the out of date stuff if I feel like eating some. I feel sorry for him; my marketing knowledge recognises how difficult it is to gain and retain customers. It is, of course, illegal for him to sell out of date stuff so he can never, never accept payment. In any case, since one can tell that I am educated, I could be an undercover Trading Standards spy. Sometimes, though, I try to slip one of the 'free' cakes through the till. Yesterday, there was a small box full of trashy cakes, so I made it clear to him that I was taking two really rubbish cakish muffiny whatevers, and then rightfully held them back at the counter as I 'wrongfully' placed another different cakey shape on the counter to go through the till with my genuine in-date products. He cottoned it and smiled at me. He doesn't watch me because he kind of trusts me to try to give him money when I don't need to. I had better check to see whether I am setting an illegal trap for him. There might be a requirement for me to report him if he does indeed sell me out of date stuff, otherwise I might be complicit somehow. Best stop doing it.

Two weeks ago, I thought it would be a good time to conduct an experiment. I am vegetarian; have been since my early twenties. Someone told me that red meat makes you violent. I don't think it does. However, I do feel cleaner and am certain I think clearer if I don't eat meat. I often surprise myself with random experiments. So, I stopped writing two weeks ago and started to eat the free, out of date stuff. Wait, what? Well, these cakey things cost less than two British pounds, some are only one pound. Having watched YouTube videos on the difference between U.S. American food and British food, I looked at the the ingredients. It is not natural for me to do that, because I make all my food from scratch. One of the things that is evidently different between likewise U.S. American food and British food is the length of the list of ingredients. These 'free' products I started to eat had huge lists of 'E's and a bunch of other stuff in them. Now, I could have run the experiment from that, but my intake wasn't enough to really contribute to any meaningful idea of the effect this rubbish might have on my mental acuity and general health, so I gave up being vegetarian AND bought processed food. The intent was to NOT eat healthily for two weeks and than go back to writing, to see how I had changed. I still have some bacon left and gorged on plastic cake yesterday.

We have to understand that by not focusing on writing, my brain muscle would weaken anyway.

This morning, I asked my private panel how I am: Harrari, the young alien, and Hakim, my spirit avatar. Harrari, kindly agreed to come, and I summoned Hakim.

one man either side of text that reads Half Penny Stories

       'You have made my job a lot easier', said Hakim. 'My job to protect you, and wake you if there is a threat to you while you sleep, has been much easier because you are sleeping so lightly, fitfully even.'

       'What do you mean?' I asked, not putting two and two together.

       'You are not sleeping deeply. When spirits are passing or when your neighbour's spirit looms over you, to whom you have given a free pass, you wake. In fact, you don't sleep much because you are alarmed.'

       'Oh, I know I am not sleeping well. But I also know that red meat gives me nightmares. In any case, I have been drinking a lot of tea and coffee lately.'

Harrari joined in. I hoped she would. I can't make her do anything and really wouldn't want to present as hostile towards the most ruthless being I have ever met. "Cake, sugar, caffeine, meat, processed food. They have all combined to make you foolish and lazy. You can't even work out the formulas you need for your spreadsheets."

I always feel as though Harrari is contemptuous of me. Indeed, she should be. Compared to her, I am stupid, stupid, stupid. She kind of likes me though, so I prefer to think she is being helpful. I can't expect her to soften truth. that would be senseless.

       'I go to bed at the same time and get up when I can't sleep any longer.'

       'No, you wait until it is past 4am, then you get up.' said Hakim from the corner of my living room. Just lately, he HAD seemed more distant. In fact, I hadn't seen much of him or Harrari for a while. Normally, when I am out, I notice things in two aspects, the real world with a tinge of spiritual forewarning or prescience. I experience sonder and feel shade. Normally, wherever I am I notice it is crowded. Lately, it has been quiet.

Lately, it has just been me chugging along, dull and unobservant, struggling to see more than what is right before me. 

Hello....Can't quite make it out. can you hear me?

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

Me in a fantasy Medieval Village

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Wednesday 3 September 2025 at 08:04

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell' or 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser. 

I am not on YouTube or social media

silhouette of a female face in profile

[ 7 minute read ]

Me in a fantasy Medieval Village

I am confused. I already know that if I saw myself coming towards me down the street I would cross the street to avoid having a conversation. Yet, I would love to have an identical twin with the same thinking characteristics as me; we would have such fun. Of course, I am able to stand outside of myself and have deep discussions with myself; you know, one of me sitting at the kitchen table, coffee cup half raised to my lips, and the other paused from doing the washing-up, while we hone in on a fine point. I am an old hand at that. We all do that, to some extent. In fact, sometimes I refer to myself as 'we'. Don't go distancing yourself from that. Whenever, you ask yourself a question; as in, taking a moment for solely pondering an issue, hands on hips or hand to chin, you are doing just the same. It is merely looking at something from a different perspective.

Yet, I would still avoid myself in the street. 

Because I know that, whenever I notice an anomaly and can be bothered to shunt it to 'Processing' I rewind the tape to see what I just did. My local shopkeeper, while I am at the counter trying to 'meet' him periodically looks away, just above my left shoulder. Does my breath smell? Is he offended by the bent of my words? Should I have washed a little better? Paranoid or observant? It is no secret that I have (I was going to write 'suffer from') Post Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD. In most cases, I understand, people with PTSD have attendant hyper-vigilance, I think because danger might jump out at us at any time. 'Once bitten, twice shy.' I have hyper-vigilance. It turns out that there is a CCTV monitor on the pillar to my left, that makes up part of the shop counter. Yep, definitely paranoid that time.

Hyper-vigilance with a high IQ is a super-power, if one wants to combine the two for good practical purposes. A driving job is enhanced by hyper-vigilance and a high IQ offers creative solutions to sudden unusual events. Good problem solving skills on my CV doesn't mean the same on my CV than on my neighbour's when I am interviewed for a job. Most of the time, I am trying to not skip a few steps in conversation so the interviewer can keep up. I once met a woman outside ALDI and as usual, I intellectually ambushed her. Don't worry, everybody gets the same treatment. Yes, I know, it is as rude as that - ambushed. However, you realise I am in charge of these words and I could rewrite a sentence or two to make it seem as though I am nice; I didn't. We'll come back to her.

Intellectually ambushing someone is a shortcut to a conversation, and for me is not at all consciously deliberate. 'Lovely weather' is an accepted opening for a conversation. I don't do that - waste of time. My autopilot is set to seek like-minded people as rapidly as possible. In a supermarket setting there are only a few seconds to displace the distractions of the supermarket shelves with something that compels the shopper to disengage from their collecting task and engage with me. I am not rude about it though, outside of interrupting people's thoughts. Guilty!

Back to the the intellectually ambushed woman (everybody gets the same treatment). Only three per cent of the worlds population (when it was still seven billion) have an IQ that matches or exceeds mine. For some context, Madonna, the eighties pop queen has an IQ ten points higher than mine. The woman outside ALDI - It was really hot last Summer, and she had bought a multi-pack of ice-lollys to take home. Yet, she was so fascinated by me; and it was keenly reciprocated, that she let her ice-lollys almost completely melt before she tore herself from our mind-meld over two hours later. There was no physical attraction between us and we openly discussed how we fancied someone or other. In other words, the pursuit of a physical union between us was far from our thoughts. That would have been the most shameful waste of our time. Our conversation took the form of making bullet points that the listener instantly filled in with content; skeletons of conversation that the other person fleshed out; connecting the dots. The rapidity of our conversation was intense while the breadth and depth seemed boundless. We, obviously, could contain it, because she, plainly, could match my IQ, or even exceed it. This was something I had longed for all my life; this conversation. She told me about how she fancied a man that all her friends warned her was a narcissistic psychopath. 

Let me just take a moment to colour-in the outline and shape of the meaning of the word 'psychopath'. Don't think 'mad axe-man raging through the woods'. Instead, think about the car driver who cuts-in at the last moment at dual carriageway narrowings, or someone who doesn't understand the impact that their actions has on others. I rather think I have described a narcissistic psychopath in the driver who cuts in at the last moment. Another metaphor is a driver who overtakes a cyclist immediately before braking for slow traffic (the cyclist will not be impeded by slow four-wheel traffic; narcissistic psychopath).

Back to the woman in the car park: Her friends had warned her that her beau is a narcissistic psychopath. What they mean is: he is a drain on everyone's resources; spiritual, financial, physical, emotional, spatial. He, being a psychopath, doesn't realise he is a drain, and he, being a narcissist, believes everything should come to him. I have deep experience of being held down and physically, mentally, and psychologically throttled by just such a person. I have PTSD from just such a person.

Let's make it colourful. we are all familiar with Disney cartoons, wherein the characters are enhanced for fun, like Baloo in 'Jungle Book'. Most of us are familiar with darker characters in video games. Let's imagine a fantasy medieval scene in which the characters have a market and the houses are oak-beamed. The woman and I are chatting in the market place while chickens in woven willow cages cluck nearby. Other women are nodding and pointing at us, though not maliciously. A few come over and say to the woman, 'Mardor is evil, stay away from him' and 'Don't fall under Mardor's spell'. They don't mean me. Right before this woman is me, known for my wit, also saying to the woman, 'Stay away!' 

This woman talking to me in ALDI car-park is that woman. I know she had never met anyone like me; she was in awe of me. She didn't realise that she was beyond equal to me. 'You're amazing', she told me. I was finding it hard to keep up with HER! You also have to understand that both of us are not good at convergent thinking, and tend to operate using largely divergent thinking. Fuzzy lines and fairies rather than grids and maps. You would think that she would listen to the women in the fantasy market and me in the real world when we say 'Stay away!' yet, she told me she was still not sure. Mardor is a Wizard. If this woman and I stood together as the 'Power of Two', no Witches or Wizards would succeed. Needless to say, she had already confessed to having PTSD and other mental disturbances. She was adrift, just like I am; remember I am confused. The chances of finding a healer in the fantasy medieval village that was cleverer than either of us is slim, at best. With only three percent of the world's population matching or exceeding our IQ any advice she gets from the local herb-gatherer will only be wheat to her. She had told me that she has hyper-vigilance, yet in love and attraction, she has none.

Most people think me a fool. I am a fool; having a high IQ doesn't make me clever. Indeed, many people can tie me in intellectual knots. For me, with divergent thinking I will probably outmatch near everyone who leans heavily on divergent thinking, but in everyday life, me with low convergent thinking, any person with uncluttered convergent thinking and an average IQ is my senior, if they have some divergent thinking (I believe it is called imagination).

I am fairly certain that the woman in the ALDI car park will be a constant source of nourishment for her 'Mardor', for some years to come. She and I were speaking an 'ancient language' well, and still she was not convinced. The 'ancient language' is the same as everyone else's and a poor attempt at a language that aliens speak.

But, I am still confused.

The Stanford-Binet method of IQ testing gives results for 40 - 60 in large parts of Africa. Without too much research it can be understood that this method of testing is for The Global North. Africans are highly adaptive, and I would perish within days if I suddenly found myself in their environments. My understanding is that someone with an IQ of 70 or less needs 24hr support to survive in the West, so go figure! as the Americans say. Since a huge part of the world's population is in Africa and Asia it should be considered highly improbable that my IQ is matched or exceeded by only 3% of the world's population, since testing for parts of the world should be conducted with a different approach to survivability in the Global North.

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
Stylised image of a figure dancing

It is not you, It is me

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Martin Cadwell, Tuesday 16 September 2025 at 07:56

All my posts: https://learn1.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/view.php?u=zw219551

or search for 'martin cadwell' or 'martin cadwell blog' in your browser. 

I am not on YouTube or social media

It is not you, It is me

[ 9 minute read ]

This is fiction in that I interviewed myself at home without a radio station and in private.

Two men facing each other beside a sign that says 'Half Penny Stories'    four stylised people facing each other mental health - PTSD

Yesterday, I rented a radio station studio and interviewed myself, live, on air. I decided that I would allow listeners to phone in with their questions, and I would answer them honestly.

       'Today, I have Martin Cadwell in the studio. Good Morning.'

       'Good morning. It is a pleasure to be here.'

       'First, Martin, let me start with a question that has always puzzled me. You are free with your words, both in public and as soliloquy. Why do you feel that you should impress your attitude on your surroundings?'

       'Well, you certainly pull no punches! Thank you. Why? Hmm! My attitude. I think our attitudes are born from our experiences. We very soon learn to take short cuts in our thinking at a very young age and if these short-cuts work in some situations, we store them as heuristics. Some people might just put it down to experience. I have experienced a lot of different people in different cultures of all ages in different countries. That doesn't make me a special person in any field of study, but it has given me an idea of how borrowing from one culture, age-group, or ideology and transplanting it into a set of circumstances I find myself in, could be a better solution to how things are actually, without intervention, playing out. I suppose I am seeking a righteous solution by speaking aloud.' 

       'You say that you are seeking a righteous solution by speaking aloud and intervention. Would you consider that you are trying to find a match to your thinking?'

       'Well, for a long time I thought that everyone was the same. Everyone has the same level of intelligence and everyone is at the same level of mental development. I was even convinced that everyone suffered in the same way from exactly the same maladies. For example, from having no experience of what a divorce feels like, I did not recognise that divorces are painful. So, in my mind, nobody suffered by divorcing their spouses. My approach had always been one in which everyone around me interpreted the world, and their immediate environment, just the same as I did. So by offering my opinion as advice, I suppose, yes, I was trying to find a match, and that match would then be the rallying point for a good solution to unfold. I felt that I was merely saying out loud what everyone else also thought but seemed to have temporarily overlooked.'

       'You speak now as though wherever you go there is conflict. Do you think you bring that conflict?'

       'Let me just finish my last answer. I was seeking a collective of similar thoughts that rally around a single banner to smother conflict.' In answer to your question, do I bring conflict: Yes, I am a very conflicted person. Something I did not realise, was that I was learning from everyone around me, soaking up my environment and trying to make sense of it. You probably know that I had some problems at a young age that made it difficult for me to experience emotions in the same way that other people do. Unfortunately, I was negatively impacted upon by the very same person's who were the people I was learning from. That is the same for all of us. Ideally, I suppose it would be good for children to spend some time away from their family and friends, in sterilised groups of people, to enable them to gain some perspective, but that simply wasn't available to me.'

       'I think they are called retreats, aren't they?'

       'Yes, retreats. So, as a child, like any child I was conflicted, but still modest enough to recognise that I am learning.'

       'And that was a fully formed thought then?'

       'Yes. And, I think it was this that set me apart from other kids. Where emotion should have been, I was filling the space with my childish logic. I knew that I had to learn from others. I didn't know who I should be learning from. So, lots of rubbish got mixed in, much like today's A.I.'

       'You are smiling. Do you empathise with machine learning?'

       'If you mean do I regard A.I. as a conflicted child with no emotion, yes, I think that is precisely what it is, and what I still am, in many ways. But, I don't think I am the only one that is like that. A.I. is supposed to emulate humans, and I think it is doing it very well. It makes, what we regard as mistakes, but if the same mistake was attributed to a human we would just say, to err is human, and look fondly at the comical blunderer, or in a court, try to discover how a fault occurred and seek redress.'

       'Do you think you should be punished for all the mistakes you have made, which in your book, you regard as vicarious mistakes? What do you mean by vicarious mistakes?'

       'If a child grows up in an environment where everyone throws their rubbish into a river that pollutes the next village downstream, it is, in my estimation, that the child will also throw rubbish into the river. This is not a mistake because, to the child, it is normal to do this. In discovering that the next village is polluted by rubbish in the river, and the child continues to throw rubbish into the river, it is a mistake to continue to throw rubbish into the river and claim that it is safe to do so. Realisation, however, is bifurcated here. It is safe to have polluting rubbish washed away from a village, and it is not safe to have polluting rubbish washed into a village. A vicarious mistake is a belief that stems from someone else's inability to reason properly. If the child believes that the polluting rubbish is washed clean by the time it gets to the next village he or she is making a vicarious mistake in not realising that the pollution is in the water, making it unsafe to drink for the people of the village downstream. So, it is a trickling down of mistakes that are absorbed by a learning entity in the formation of a supposedly reasonable decision-maker, in later years. As to being punished, I think we can only punish ourselves. It would do no good for me to punish you, and you to punish someone else. With, supposedly only six degrees of separation between all of us, the anguish I cause you by punishing you, and so on, would come back to me from hundreds, if not, thousands of people daily.'

       'We have Simon on the line in Kent. You have a question for Martin.'

       'Hello, thank you for having me on. Martin, I think you are up your own fundament. Why do you think you are so special? You have already told us you are damaged goods. Why should anyone listen to the rubbish that comes out of your mouth, when you know it pollutes us?' 

       'You shouldn't have to, should you? I understand why you are cross, why you consider me weaker than you, and why you feel sidelined.'

       'I didn't say that. I am trying to establish why you think your holier than thou attitude is useful to the everyday population of Britain.'

       'It isn't, Simon. I am not comfortable in my life, or with my life. I have, in talking to myself, told myself I wanted a divorce from myself. A complete separation. I spent many years sifting through my life trying to find episodes in which I was the instigator of conflict and lies. I have tried to forgive all the people who hurt me, failed to protect me, lied to me, and cheated me. I have not been able to do that in its entirety. I have not been able to do that because I find it difficult to forgive myself once I have forgiven everyone else. I am a product of my environment and I failed to recognise that until it was too late. Of course, Simon, I am not at fault for blindly acting as I did before I knew it was wrong. I made vicarious mistakes because I did not know differently. I cannot forgive myself for continuing to act badly, for allowing the vicarious mistakes to become my own mistakes. I did not spend any time trying to separate other people's mistakes from my own. So, Simon, I don't think I am better or worse than you, because I still use heuristics that are hard-wired into my make-up. A long time ago, someone said to me that he wished he did not know so much. He was troubled. It was obvious. Today, Simon, I am troubled. Yesterday I was troubled, and tomorrow I will be troubled. When I wrote my book, I had an idea that I would put a preface in it that read, 'If you want to know about me, observe yourself.'

       'Searing! Thank you for your call, Simon. I hope you feel that Martin has answered your question. Martin, you mentioned that you have tried to forgive everyone else but find it hard to forgive yourself. Could you go into a little more detail?'

       'Forgiveness is not something that is done on the spur of the moment. If someone stole my car, I could not simply and immediately forgive the thief. None of us can. I might just as well attribute no value to my car or any of my belongings. There would be no point in taking the keys out or locking the doors. I have PTSD. I have to make a conscious decision to forgive. I don't have the emotional connection to other people in the same way that most other people do; not all people, because everyone, I feel, think, is different and have a greater or lesser ability to empathise with other people. Most of me is made up of childish logic with amendments made by the adult-me who has experienced more than childish-me. The emotional detachment I experienced as a child left a vacuum for ruthlessness to thrive. It is that ruthlessness alongside emotional detachment, which by the way, I can to some extent, still switch on or off, that allows me to be objective about my past actions. I know I can be objective. In many ways, I live my life as an ascetic and place little value in assets. I recognise that optional and discretionary goods are luxuries, and many other people do not. I never seem to remember this though. It is this lack of enthusiasm in me to engage on a personal level with other people's perceived need for things; things that I regard as superfluous to a settled existence that I cannot forgive in myself. I know I can and should, but I don't want to because it is the last shred of who I am, or more precisely was and still am. It is a spoiled part of me which I cannot eradicate.'

       'Martin Cadwell, thank you. It has been a pleasure.'

       'Thank you. The pleasure was mine.'

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 79206