OU blog

Personal Blogs

Richard Walker

The World of Triangles: An Etymological Treasure Trove

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Wednesday 22 April 2026 at 01:21

In the world of triangle we find a rich etymological heritage, with most words having old roots, with many going back to Proto-Indo-European (PIE), the 5000-ish year old ancestor of most European languages and many from Northern India and the Iranian region.

Triangle is from Old French, from Latin triangulum. The tri- is from PIE *treyes, 'three' obviously, but -angle is less obvious; the PIE root is *ang or *ank, 'bend', which is also the source of ankle.

It also seems the Angles (as in East Anglia) took their name from the same root, perhap in reference to a bend in the coastline of their original homeland, or alternatively because the hooks they used to catch fish, so they would be 'The people of the fishing-hook' according to this theory.

Triangles come in many flavours and I've sketched some below. Triangle can be classified by the size of their largest angle, or by how many equal sides they have. In this post I'm only looking at the first classification, by angle, and I'll look at classification by equal sides in another post.

Number 1, the Acute, has all angles less than 90 degrees, so they are 'sharp'. Acute is derived from Latin acutis 'sharp', from PIE *ak-, 'sharp' or 'pointy', from which we get many words, such as acid, acropolis, acupuncture, eager and oxygen.

Number 2, the Obtuse, has an angle greater than 90 degrees. Obtuse means 'not sharp', from Latin obtusus, 'blunt', from PIE *(s)teu-,'beat' or 'push. This is the source also of type (from being struck), stupid (as in struck insensible), student (students push forward keenly) and stupendous (stunning).

Number 3, the Right-Angled, has a 90 degree angle, and sits right (!) on the cusp between (1) and (2). The right part is a translation of Latin rectus, 'upright', into Old English riht, 'straight', which both descends ultimately from PIE *reg-, the root of a whole host of words around being correct or regulated, or reigning, or being a maharajah, or being reckless, or being regal.

And it is the first element of my given name Richard!This is a so-called dithemic name, a compound of two Germanic elements meaning 'strong ruler' but with the ruler element first. So my name has the same PIE origin as right as in right angle.

Finally an old joke. See if you can spot how this ties in with PIE *reg-,

Did you hear about the king who was only 12 inches tall? He was a lousy king but a great ruler.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Richard Walker, Wednesday 22 April 2026 at 01:02)
Share post
Richard Walker

The Mathematical Gem That Stumped A Nobel Laureate

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Richard Walker, Saturday 28 March 2026 at 00:49

In any triangle, if we join each vertex to the point one-third along the side opposite, the area of the triangle this creates has one-seventh the area of the triangle we started with.

Figure 1

The story goes that the Nobel Prize winning physicist Richard Feynman was introduced to this theorem at a dinner following a talk he gave at Cornell University. Feynman was apparently disbelieving at first, and even sought to disprove it, because the combination of numbers 3 and 7 seemed too unlikely be true. After a time he accepted it and then spent the rest of the evening finding a proof.

I read somewhere that Feynman wrote about the difference between physics and mathematics and maybe this story illustrates a difference between practitioner of the two disciplines. I think the typical mathematician would see the surprising combination of 3 and 7 as being so neat that it's difficult to conceive of the theorem not being true!

Coming across the theorem recently I knew I'd seen it before but couldn't remember the proof or even if I'd ever known one. So I thought I would come up with my own. I wanted a proof that didn't use any coordinate geometry (or vectors or complex numbers) or trigonometry or a long chain geometrical reasoning, or any moving parts.

I knew that sometimes with problems of this kind we can prove what we want by using multiple copies of a figure to build up repeating tiling pattern, a tessellation. so I experiments with various possibilities but without joy.

I left it a while and when I went back bingo! I saw how to draw the 'look and see' proof in Figure 2.

Figure 2

This uses 12 additional triangles congruent to the small inner triangle of Figure 1. They are grouped by fours into three parallelograms, and each side of the original triangle exactly bisects a parallelogram. The original triangle is made up from half of each of the three parallelograms plus the small inner triangle. If we let normal cap delta represent the area of the small triangle we have

Area of original triangle equation sequence part 1 equals part 2 three multiplication one divided by two multiplication four times normal cap delta plus normal cap delta equals part 3 six times normal cap delta plus normal cap delta equals part 4 seven times normal cap delta

So the small inner triangle has one-seventh the area of the original one, as claimed.

Doubtless this proof is not new—many people must have discovered it before me—but it was new to me and I was pleased to have worked it out.

Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 6282772