Personal Blogs

Software engineering is done by people, but what people do to build software depends on the nature of software that is to be created. The culture of individuals, technologies and organisations also plays an important role too.

At the turn of the century, there was a new idea about how to build software; something called agile development. This led to the creation of something called the Manifesto for Agile Software Development If you’re interested in software development and want to know something about what ‘agile’ means, you need to have a look at the manifesto.

I first learnt about agile through something called eXtreme Programming (Wikipedia), and then something called Scrum (Wikipedia) (Don’t use Wikipedia in your TMAs; always use official references). In my eyes, the notable characteristic about agile (or Agile; there’s a difference between small ‘a’ agile, and large ‘A’ agile) is that it is all about people. Agile (in its different forms) helps to establish rituals which can, in turn, help software engineers to talk about that ‘invisible stuff’ which is software.

I recently asked a colleague, Advait Deshpande, who was the chair of an agile practices microcredential what the latest trends were in agile software development. He was kind enough to share links to some interesting articles and resources.

Articles about agile

 Here are some review articles that might be useful to anyone who is starting to study agile:

Edison, H., Wang, X., & Conboy, K. (2021). Comparing methods for large-scale agile software development: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(8), 2709-2731. Available at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9387593/

Vallon, R., da Silva Estácio, B. J., Prikladnicki, R., & Grechenig, T. (2018). Systematic literature review on agile practices in global software development. Information and Software Technology, 96, 161-180. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584917302975

Other resources

Advait also shared the following two links, which he gives me permission to share here: UK Government: Agile delivery - Agile tools and techniques.

The notion of ‘agile’ has moved beyond software, but to business. It is important to distinguish between the two. This second link emphasises what agile might mean within a business context: Agile Business Consortium: Business Agility.

Post (or peak) agile

Once, agile was the new thing on the block. Now agile has become mainstream. An accompanying question is: have we reached post (or peak) agile? Also, what comes next? One of the criticisms of agile is that it is best suited to smaller teams, which puts a limit to how it can be applied to bigger projects. There have been several attempts to address this:

• Large scale Scrum
• Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD)
• Scaled Agile Framework (SAFE)

Advait directed me to a talk that was hosted on YouTube that had a provocative title:

• Agile is Dead by Pragmatic Dave Thomas

I know Dave Thomas from a book I have on my shelf at home; a book called ‘the pragmatic programmer’ – it is a good read, and is packed filled with some very practical advice. His talk about agile is worth a watch. He presents a critical view of the ‘agile industry’ in a humorous and engaging way. It is worth a watch. He talks about the origins of the agile manifesto, as well as ‘large agile’. An important point is that when thinking about how to create software, we need to think critically too.

Reflections

When I was learning about software engineering as an undergraduate, I was introduced to something called the software development lifecycle (or SDLC). There are different models; there’s a waterfall model, a spiral model, and there was something called SSADM which bored me to hears. It was only after I graduated that I later learnt about agile in all different guises.

When I started working as a software engineer, the company that I worked for didn’t have a software development process, so we had to make one. Culture and experience are themes that can influence decisions about what is done. I was lucky enough to work with someone who had had a lot of experience, for which I was really thankful for.

We set up policies and processes. We also applied techniques that had an agile flavour, bits of pair programming, and aspects of test driven development. Our processes needed to work for both the products and the people who were developing the software. We needed to be pragmatic to get things done.

Acknowledgements

Thanks are extended to Advait Deshpande. I really appreciated the chat and all the links he shared.

After becoming the module chair of TM354 Software Engineering, I had a look at two related postgraduate modules, M813 Software Development and M814 Software Engineering. 

These two modules sit alongside a number of other modules that make up the MSc in Computing programme. My intention was to see what related topics and subjects are taught, and whether there were any notable differences about how they were taught. 

This blog aims to highlight some of the key elements of these modules. To prepare this post, I had a good look through the module materials, including the assessment materials, and spoke with each of the module chairs. My intention of looking at these modules is to identify what themes and topics might potentially feed into a future replacement of TM354, or another related module. This summary is by no means comprehensive; the points I pick up on do, of course, reflect my interests.

I hope these notes are useful to anyone who is interested in either software engineering, or postgraduate computing, or both. Towards the end of the blog, I share a quick compare and contrast between the two modules and share some links to resources for anyone who might be interested.

M813 Software Development

M813 aims to “to provide the skills and knowledge necessary to develop software in accordance with current professional practice, approaches and techniques”.

The key module learning aims are to:

• teach you a variety of fundamental techniques for software development across the software lifecycle, and to provide practice in the use of these techniques
• give you enough knowledge to be able to choose between different development techniques appropriate for a software development context
• make you aware of design and technology trade-offs involved in developing enterprise software systems
• enable you to evaluate current software development practices
• give you an understanding of current and emerging issues in software development
• give you the research skills needed to stay at the leading edge of software development.

The module description suggests that students “will have an opportunity to engage with an organisational problem of your choice, working towards a fit-for-purpose software solution” and students “will also have an opportunity to carry out some independent research into issues in software development, including analysing, evaluating and presenting results”.

It makes use of a set text, Head First Design Patterns, accessed through the university library. To help students with the more technical bits, it shares some resources about a graphical tool, Visual Paradigm, which enables students to create diagrams using the Unified Modelling Language (UML).

The module has 10 units of study, which are spread over four blocks. The module’s assessment strategy summarised below, followed by each of the blocks.

Assessment strategy

Like many other modules, there are two parts of assessment: tutor marked assessments (TMAs), and an examinable component, which is an end of module assessment (EMA). Interestingly, the TMAs adopt a more practical and software development skills perspective, whereas the EMA is more about carrying out research which is applied to a study context. To pass the module, students need to gain an average score of 50% in both of the components.

TMAs 1 and 3 account for 30% of the continually assessed part of the module. Due to the practical focus of TMA 2, this assessment accounts for 40% of the overall TMA score.

Block 1: Software development and early lifecycle

This block is described as helping to “learn the principles and techniques of early software lifecycle, from requirements and domain analysis to software specification. You will engage with a number of practices, including capturing and validating requirements, and UML (Unified Modelling Language) modelling with activity and class diagrams.”

The model opens with a research activity which involves finding and reading academic articles. There are three other research activities which build on this first searching activity. These activities helps students to understand what the academic study of software engineering looks like. Plus, when working as a practicing software engineer, it’s important to know how to find and evaluate information about methods, approaches, and frameworks.

This unit beings to introduce students to a tool that they will use during the module; Visual Paradigm. Throughout the module, students will learn more about different UML diagrams, such as use cases, class diagrams, and activity diagrams.

Unit 1, introducing software development, shares a couple of perspectives: a philosophical perspective and a historical perspective (history is always useful), before mentioning risk, quality and then moving onto starting to look at UML.

Unit 2, requirements and use cases, covers the characteristics of requirements and the forms that they can be presented. Unit 3, from the context to the system, starts with activity diagram (which are all about representing a context) through to class diagrams, which is all about beginning to realise a design of software using abstractions. Finally, unit 4, specifying what the system should do, touches on more formal aspects of software specification.

Block 2: Design and code

This next block explores “principles and techniques of software design, construction, testing and version control”. Other topics include design patterns, UML modelling with state diagrams and creating of software using the Java language. Out of all the blocks in the module, this is the one that has a really practical focus.

In addition to links to further video tutorials about Visual Paradigm, there’s some guidance about how to start to use Microsoft Visual Studio Code, and some initial development activities.

Unit 5, design, introduces some basic design principles, and new forms of diagram: communication diagrams and object diagrams. Unit 6, from design to code, shares a bit more detail about the principles of object-oriented programming, and goes onto introducing the topic of configuration management. Unit 7, design patterns, continues the theme of object-oriented programming by introducing a set of patterns from the Gang of Four text, which is complemented by a software development activity. 

Block 3: Software architectures and systems integration

Block 3 goes up a level to explore how to “develop software solutions based on software architectures and frameworks”. 

Unit 8, software architectures introduces the notion of architectural patterns, and how to model patterns using UML. Another useful topic introduced is state machines. An important theme that is highlighted is the idea of layer of software which, in turn, is linked to the notion of persistence (which means ‘how data can be saved’). This is complemented by unit 9, component-based architectures, which offers a specific example.  The module concludes with unit 10, service-oriented architectures.

Block 4: EMA preparation

This fourth block relates to the module’s end of module assessment (EMA), where students have to carry out some applied research into a software context in which they are familiar with. To help students to prepare, there are some useful preparatory resources.

Reflections

I really liked that this module brings in a bit of history, describing the history of object-oriented programming. I also liked that it shared some really useful descriptions about the differences between scholarship and research. There are some common elements between M813 and TM354, such as requirements and the use of UML, but I’ll say more about this in a later section.

M814 Software Engineering

M814 is “about advanced concepts and techniques used throughout the software life cycle” and replaces two earlier 15 point modules: M882 Software Project Management and M883 Requirements Engineering.

The module aims are to:

• develop your ability in the critical evaluation of the theories, practices and systems used in a range of areas of Computing
• provide you with a specialised area of study in order that you can experience and develop the frontiers of practice and research in focused aspects of Computing and its application
• encourage you, through the provision of appropriate educational activities, to develop study and transferable skills applicable to your employment and continuing professional development
• enable you to develop a deeper understanding of a specialist area of Computing and to contribute to future developments in the field.

Although this module is less ‘applied’ than M813, there are some important elements. Students make use Git and GitHub, and use a simulation and modelling tool, InsightMaker.

The module has four study blocks, containing 26 study units; a lot more than M813. These are summarised in the following sections. Students are also required to consult a set text, Mastering the requirements process by Robertson and Robertson, which is also available through the OU Library.

Assessment strategy

The module has three TMAs and an end of module exam, which is taken remotely (as opposed to an EMA). TMAs 1 and 3 have a weighting of 30% each, with TMA 2 being slightly more substantial, accounting for 40%. Students have to pass both the TMAs and the exam, gaining an average of 50% in each.

The exam covers all module learning outcomes and is split into two sections. For the second section students would have needed to be familiar with a research article.

Block 1: Software engineering context

The first two units, unit 1, software in the information society and unit 2, the organisational and business context, introduces software engineering. This is followed by an introduction to the organisational context through unit 3, organisational context, codes and standards. The title of this unit refers to professional codes, and professional and technical standards. Accompanying topics include software and the law, which includes intellectual properly, trademarking, patents, and data protection (GDPR) legislation. The final unit, unit 4, addresses ethics and values in software engineering.

Block 2: Software engineering methods and processes

Block 2 concerns software engineering methods and processes. The first two units highlights the notion of the process model, project management, and quality management, which includes the ISO 9001 standard and the Capability Maturity Model (CMMI). These are presented in unit 6, software activities and unit 7, software engineering processes. 

The module then covers unit 8, agile processes and unit 9, managing resources, which includes materials about SCRUM, Kanban, and something called the SAFe framework, which is a set of workflow patterns for implementing agile practices. There is also a case study which describes how agile is used in practice. I remember seeing some photographs that show how developers have been sharing information about project status using whiteboard and other displays. The module concludes with unit 10,  managing uncertainty and risk, and unit 11, software quality.

A part of this block makes use of simulation, introducing a ‘simulation modelling tool’ which can be used to experiment with the concept of Brooks’ law. As an aside, this reminds me of a short article that touched on a similar topic. In the context of M814, I like how the idea of simulation has been applied in an interesting and pedagogically helpful way.

Block 3: Software deployment and evaluation

Block 3 concerns software deployment and evolution. In other words, what happens after implementation. It includes some materials about DevOps (the integration of development with the operation of software), and continual integration and delivery. There are three units: unit 12, software configuration management, which introduces Git and GitHub, unit 13, software deployment, and unit 14, software maintenance and evolution.

This block returns to simulation, specifically exploring Lehman’s 2nd law (Wikipedia), which means that software complexity increases unless something is done to reduce it. Students are also directed to a text book, Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation, by Humble and Farley. 

Block 4: Back to the beginning

The final block returns to the beginning by looking at requirements engineering, extensively drawing on the set text, Mastering the Requirements Process. It introduces what is meant by requirements engineering, a subtopic within software engineering. Unit titles for this block includes scoping the business problem, functional and non-functional requirements, fit criteria and rationale, ensuring quality of requirements, and reusing requirements. The block concludes with a useful section: unit 26, current trends in software engineering.

Reflections

I really liked the introductory sections to this module; they adopt a philosophical tone. I also really like how it uses case studies. What is notable is that there are a lot of materials to get through, but all the topics and units are certainly appropriate and are needed to cover the module in a good amount of depth.

Similarities and differences

There is understandably some cross over between M813 and M814; they complement each other. M813 is more of an ‘applied’ module than either M814 or TM354, but M814 does contain a few practical elements. It’s use of simulations is particularly interesting. In comparison to the undergraduate software engineering module, TM354, the two postgraduate modules do clearly require the application of higher academic skills, such as understanding what it means to carry out scholarship.

In my opinion, there appear to be more similarities between M813 and TM354 than with M814. It is worth noting that TM354 introduces topics that can be found in both postgraduate modules.

TM354 and M813 both emphasise design patterns. An important difference is that in M813, students are required to demonstrate how patterns might be applied, whereas on TM354 students have to necessarily demonstrate their understanding of design patterns that have been chosen by the module team. Both modules also explore the notions of software architectures and state machines.

There are differences between TM354 and M813 in terms of tools. TM354 steers away from the use of diagramming tools, but by way of contrast, M813 makes extensive use of Visual Paradigm. TM354 makes use of NetBeans for the design patterns task, whereas M813 introduces students to Visual Studio Code.

By way of contrast, M814 covers wider variety of concepts which are important to the building of ‘software in the large’; the importance of software maintenance and the characteristics of software quality.

UML is featured in all three modules. They all refer to software development methods and requirements engineering. Significantly, they all use the Roberston and Robertson text. The differ in terms of the depth they explore the topic.

To conclude, software development and software engineering are huge subjects. The three modules that are mentioned in this blog can only begin to scratch the surface. Every problem will have a unique set of requirements, and every problem will require different methods. There are two key elements: people and technology. Software is designed by people and used by people. Where there’s people, there’s always complexity. Adding technology in the mix adds an additional dimension of complexity.

Resources

The following links takes you to some useful OpenLearn resources:

• Succeeding in postgraduate study
• A sample of TM354 module materials: Approaches to software development
• A sample of M813: An introduction to software development
• A sample of M814: Software and the law

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Arosha Bandara who spent some time introducing me to some the key elements of M814. I also extend thanks to Yujin Yu. Both Arosha and Yujin are professors of software engineering. The current chair of M814 is Professor Andrea Zisman, who is also a professor of software engineering. Thanks are also extended to the TM354 module team: Michael Ulman, Richard Walker, Petra Wolf and Andrea Zisman.

If your TM470 project is all about the developing software to solve a problem, requirements are really important. Requirements are all about specifying what needs to be built and what software needs to do. A good set of requirements will also enable you to decide whether or not your software development has been successful. They can help you to answer the question: “does it do what we expect it to do?” There is a direct link between requirements and testing.

The exact nature of your requirements will depend on the nature of your project. There are different types of requirements. Two high level types of requirements are: functional requirements and non-functional requirements. Modules such as TM354 Software Engineering provide some further information about the different types and categories, and different aspects you might want to consider. 

One thing that you need to decide on is: how to you write down your requirements? The decisions that you take will, of course, relate to what your project is all about. Some projects will need formal approaches, perhaps using Volere shells, whereas other projects may use something like use case diagrams. If your project is interaction design heavy, your requirements may be embodied with artefacts such as sketches, prototypes, scenarios and personas. To learn more about these different approaches, you need to refer back to the module materials for some of the modules you have studied. You should also consider having a look in the OU library to see what you can find.

There is also, of course, also a link between your chosen project model, and your choice of requirements. Stakeholders are also of fundamental importance: you need to know who to speak with to uncover what your requirements are. You need to make a decision about how to record your requirements, and justify why you have adopted a particular approach. Different people will, of course, understand requirements in different ways. How you speak to fellow software engineers will be different to how you speak to end users.

I recently listened to a really interesting podcast about requirements engineering from something called Software Engineering Radio, which is associated with the IEEE Software magazine. Here's a link to the podcast: Software Requirements Essentials: SE Radio 604 Karl Wiegers and Candase Hokanson.

Although this is just over an hour (and I know everyone is busy), it is worth a listen.

Some key themes and topics addressed in this podcast includes:

• What do requirements mean?
• What is requirements elicitation?
• How can requirements be presented? Or, what is does a requirement specification look like?
• Do users know what they need?
• How much requirements analysis is needed?

The podcast concludes with a question which begins: what tips would you share for someone who is involved with an ongoing project? (The answer to this question is very pragmatic)

Reflections

An interesting reflection (and comment that emerged from this podcast) is that the requirements approach that you adopt relates to the risks that are inherent within your project, and the implications of any potential software failures. This, in turn, is linked to the LSEP issues which are starting to be explored within your TM470 TMA 2.

When you are addressing requirements, you can highlight different requirement gathering approaches in your literature review. Do use module materials that you have previously studied as a jumping off point to do some further reading about the subject by looking at resources you can find in the OU library, but do be mindful about getting sucked into various ‘rabbit holes’; requirements engineering is a subject all of its own. When it comes to your TM470 project, you need to make practical decisions, and justify your decisions.

One of the tools (or languages) I learnt as a graduate student was UML; the unified-modelling language. UML is a standard that describes a group of related diagrams. Different diagrams describe different aspects of a software system. UML is used for design, but it can also be used to document requirements, and can help with communication between developers and engineers. If you are able to use UML, you’re able to share ideas about code and software with others more fluently.

One of the tools that I learnt about was a graduate student was Rational Rose, which is now called . At the time I thought it was witchcraft. You could sketch out a diagram using a drawing tool and it would be able to generate some computer code for you.

The postgraduate module M813 Software Development introduces students to a tool called Visual Paradigm which is a tool that I’ve never heard about before. This said, it does bear some similarities with other graphical software design tools that I’ve had the opportunity to have a play with.

The aim of this post is to share some notes and weblink that I’ve collated about Visual Paradigm and other related tools.

Looking at Visual Paradigm

After installing a trial version of Visual Paradigm, I’m taken to a training page: Visual Paradigm Essentials.

From here, I’m taken to an Udemy course, Visual Paradigm essentials where apparently there are 27 hours’ worth of video lectures to attend. The introductory course is intended to help users to “learn all essential skills of software design and modeling including, UML, BPMN and SysML”.

I picked up the following points from the introduction: it can be used to create use cases, business process diagrams, user stories, and a whole host of other diagrams. It also links to agile software development practices, and can play a role in user experience and customer experience design. 

Here is an abbreviated list of diagram types it supports: user experience diagrams (wireframes and sequence visualisation), customer experience maps, software system design diagrams (UML and cloud architecture design diagrams), entity relationship diagrams (database designs) and business design diagram diagrams (such as business process tools and organization chart tools).

It was also mentioned that it could generate and reverse source code from diagrams, and could be used to generate basic code. Database creation scripts could be generated from entity relationship diagrams.

Other tools and environments

In TM354 Software Engineering students use a tool called NetBeans, a Java integrated development environment. 

After a bit of internet searching about NetBeans and UML, I found there was a NetBeans plugin called easyUML. EasyUML makes it possible to convert Java code into class diagrams. 

Whilst digging around, I found a related bit of software called PlantUML. Related to this project, there is also a NetBeans plugin called PlantUML-NB. The interesting thing about PlantUML is that is can generate UML diagrams from relatively small bits of text which is not too dissimilar to code. The textual basis of this utility reminds me of a tool called UMLet  which I’ve written about previously. 

It wasn’t too long until I discovered this page: Visual Paradigm IDE integration. This page suggests it is possible to connect Visual Paradigm and NetBeans together; potentially facilitating that bit of witchcraft that I alluded to earlier. To substantiate this suspicion, I found an accompanying video clip called Perform UML Modeling in NetBeans with Visual Paradigm (YouTube).

Whilst looking at UMLet, I noticed that there was a reference to a Microsoft product called Visual Studio Code. When I was a developer working in industry, I used Microsoft Visual Studio every day. It turns out that Microsoft Visual Studio (Wikipedia)Microsoft Visual Studio (Wikipedia) is different to Microsoft Visual Studio Code (Wikipedia)Microsoft Visual Studio Code (Wikipedia) despite having a very similar name. Clearly things have moved on since I was a full time developer. There are a few things I need to catch up on.

Whilst reminding myself about bits of the Microsoft developer toolset, I found this article, which was all about Visual Studio and Visual Paradigm Integration.

Reflections

Different modules use different bits of software. Across the computing curriculum, computing students will be exposed to Python, Java and JavaScript. This will mean that they will be exposed to different programming environments and toolsets. Getting to grips with different environments and tools is a necessary graduate skill. What I will say is that when it comes to software engineering, graphical tools are likely to be important, along with other tools. The exact make up will, of course, depend on the context of software, and the problems that they are required to solve.

On Saturday 27 September I went to a briefing for a new OU module, TM354 Software Engineering.   I have to secretly confess that I was quite looking forward to this event for a number of reasons: I haven’t studied software engineering with the OU (which meant that I was curious), I have good memories of my software engineering classes from my undergraduate days and I also used to do what was loosely called software engineering when I had a job in industry.  A big question that I had was: ‘to what extent is it different to the stuff that I studied as an undergrad?’  The answer was: ‘quite a bit was different, but then again, there was quite a bit that was the same too’.

I remember my old undergrad lecturer introducing software engineering by saying something like, ‘this module covers all the important computer stuff that isn’t in any of the other modules’.   It seemed like an incredibly simple description (and one that is also a bit controversial), but it is one that has stuck in my mind.  In my mind, software engineering is a whole lot more than just being other stuff.

This blog post summary of the event is mostly intended for the tutors who came along to the day, but I hope it might be useful for anyone else who might be interested in either studying or tutoring the module.  There’s information about the module structure, something about the software that we use, and also something about the scheduling of the tutorials.

Module structure

TM354 has three blocks, which are also printed books.  These are: Block 1 – from domain to requirements, Block 2 – from analysis to design, and Block 3 – from architecture to product.  An important aspect to the module is a set of case studies.  The module is also supported by a module website and, interestingly, a software tool called ShareSpace that enables students to share different sketches or designs.  (This is a version of a tool that has been used in other modules such as U101, the undergraduate design module, and T174, an introduction to engineering module).

Block 1 : from domain to requirements

Each block contains a bunch of units.  The first unit is entitled ‘approaches to software development’, which, I believe, draws a distinction between plan driven software development and agile software development.  I’ve also noted down the phrase ‘modelling with software engineering’.  It’s great to see agile mentioned in this block, as well as modelling.  When I worked in industry as a developer, we used bits of both.

The second unit is called requirements concepts.  This covers functional requirements, non-functional (I’m guessing this is things like ‘compatibility with existing systems’ and ‘maintainability’ – but I could be wrong, since I’ve not been through the module materials yet), testing, and what and how to document.  Another note I’ve made is: ‘perspectives on agile documentation’.

Unit three is from domain modelling to requirements.  Apparently this is all about business rules and processes, and capturing requirements with use cases.  Prototyping is also mentioned.  (These are both terms that would be familiar with students who have taken the M364 Interaction Design module).  Unit four is all about the case study (of which I have to confess that I don’t know anything about!)

Block 2: from analysis to design

Unit five is about structural modelling of domain versus the solution.  Unit six is about dynamic modelling, which includes design by contract.  Unfortunately, my notes were getting a bit weak at this point, but I seem to remember thinking, ‘ahh… I wonder if this relates to the way that I used to put assertions in my code when I was a coder’.  This introduction was piquing my interest.

Unit seven was entitled, ‘more dynamic modelling’, specifically covering states and activities, and capturing complex interactions.  Apparently the black art of ‘state machines’ are also covered in this bit.  (In my undergrad days, state machine were only covered in the completely baffling programming languages course) .  Unit eight then moves onto the second part of the case study which might contain domain modelling, analysis and design.

Block 3: from architecture to product

This block jumped out at me as being the most interesting (but this reflects my own interests).  Unit nine was about ‘architecture, patterns and reuse’.  Architecture and requirements, I’ve noted, ‘go hand in hand’.  In this section there’s something about architectural views and reuse in the small and reuse in the large.  During the briefing there was a discussion about architectural styles, frameworks and software design patterns.

When I was an undergrad, software patterns hadn’t been discovered yet.  It’s great to see them in this module, since they are a really important subject.  I used to tell people that patterns are like sets of abstractions that allow people to talk about software.  I think everyone who is a serious software developer should know something about patterns.

Unit ten seems to take a wider perspective, talking about ‘building blocks and enterprise architectures’.  Other topics include component based development, services and service oriented architectures (which is a topic that is touched upon in another module, and also potentially the forthcoming TM352 module that covers cloud computing).

Unit eleven is about quality, verification, metrics and testing.  My undergrad module contained loads of material on metrics and reliability, and testing was covered only in a fairly theoretical way, but I understand that test-driven development is covered in this module (which is a topic that is linked to agile methods).  I’ll be interested to look at the metrics bit when this bit of the module is finalised.

The final unit takes us back to the case study.  Apparently we look at architectural views and patterns.  Apparently there are also a set of further topics that are looked.  I’m guessing that students might well have to go digging for papers in the OU’s huge on-line library.

Software

I’ve mentioned ShareSpace, which is all about sharing of software models with other students (modelling is an important skill), to enable students to gain experience of group work and to see what other students are doing and creating: software development invariably happens in teams.  Another important bit of software is an open source IDE (integrated development environment) called NetBeans.  I’m not sure how NetBeans is going to be used in this module, but it is used across a number of different OU modules, so it should be familiar to some TM354 students.

Assessment

TM354 comprises of three tutor marked assignments, a formative quiz at the end of every unit (that students are strongly encouraged to complete), and an end of module exam.  The exam comprises of two parts: a part that has questions about concepts, and a second bit that contains longer questions (I can’t say any more than this, since I don’t know what the exam looks like!)

Tutorials

Each tutor is required to deliver two hours of face to face tuition, and eight hours of on-line sessions through OU Live (as far as I understand).  In the London region, we have three tutors, so what we’re doing is we’re having all the groups come to the same events and we’re having each tutor deliver a face to face session to support students through every block and every TMA. 

We’re also planning on explicitly scheduling six hours of OU Live time, leaving two hours that the tutor can use at his or her discretion throughout the module (so, if there are a group of students who struggle with concepts such as metrics, design by contract, or patterns, a couple of short ad-hoc sessions can be scheduled). 

All the OU Live sessions will be presented through a regional OU Live room.  This means that students in one tutor group can visit a session that is delivered by another London tutor.  The benefit of explicitly scheduling these sessions in advance is that all these events are presented within the student’s module calendar (so they can’t say that they didn’t know about them!)  All these plans are roughly in line with the new tuition strategy policy that is coming from the higher levels of the university.  A final thought regarding the on-line sessions is that it is recommended that tutors record them, so students can listen to the events (and potentially go through subjects that they find difficult) after an event has taken place.

A final note that I’ve made in my notebook is ‘tutorial resources sharing (thread to share)’.  This is connected to a tutor’s forum that all TM354 tutors should have access to.  I think there should be a thread somewhere that is all about the sharing of both on-line and off-line (face to face) tutorial resources.