Twenty years had gone by.
She saw at once
I'd lost a tooth.
Twenty years had gone by.
She saw at once
I'd lost a tooth.
I've lost so many things
But got that scarf back.
Daisy
I feel tired now.
You've already closed, bless you.
Writing that fish can sing reminded me that mice also sing.
Reprised from this blog 2 April 2010 here is a clip of a mouse singing. This is a serenade to a female mouse.
Click hereAudio player: audioS1.mp3
It was at a much higher pitch originally and has been adjusted down to a range suitable for human ears.
Discussing the Shakespeare sonnet "That time of year" naturally made me think about the dawn chorus (of birds) and that led me on to something I'd forgotten about, the evening chorus (of fishes).
Fish can vocalize and on some coral reefs vast numbers of certain species "sing" at the same time of day. It's usually near nighttime and forms an underwater evening chorus. It may be related to feeding or reproduction, depending on the species.
Birds (and humans) sing according to the time of day (and year) but the singing behavior of some fishes is also affected by the phase of the moon.
More information is here.
Isn't that surprising? I wish I had been able to find a sound clip of fish singing but sadly not.
Go to bed old man.
Who cares anyway?
All this blah blah blah about winter.
Thinking and loving are not different.
When we look up we see a falling star.
I wrote before about Shakespeare's sonnet 73
is an example. In nine words (and 10 syllables) we are carried from "yellow leaves" (the poet lets us know it's autumn, a time of decay) through "or none" (everything is gone) to "or few" (not quite none, but going).
This economy is extraordinary, as is the whole poem with its metaphor of the seasons, the time of day, and the stages of a human life, all rolled into one, and the final plea to hold on tightly against the flickering light.
So my earlier and inadequate attempt to capture the sonnet in a Haiku needs some more work.
Should a verse be sweet? Or sour?
Hot or cold?
Today's food for thought.
Somewhere Summer crossed into Autumn.
And then I felt Winter's bite.
A tooth fell out.
On my plate
A rainbow salad.
Four seasons in one.
In the middle ages - it is said - there was such a thing as trial by ordeal.
Simply put (in the law of Athelstan, ruler of England 924 to 927)
1. You are accused of a crime
2. You need to prove you are innocent
3. You plunge one hand in boiling water and retrieve a stone from the bottom of the vessel.
There's a tariff. 1 accuser = up to the wrist. 3 accusers = up to the elbow.
If your burns started to heal after three days then you are judged innocent.
Ironically, Athelstan means "noble stone".
If this was ever really applied then I can't conceal my contempt for such a way of thinking. How could anyone even begin to believe (or perhaps just cynically suggest to others) that such a process would reveal truth?
In the modern age a physicist reinvented this idea of ordeal, but he was not on trial. The accusation went the other way now. Science and truth were attacking irrationality and fear. The accuser - Jearl Walker - plunged his hand into not just boiling water but molten lead, to support rational thought.
Jearl Walker wrote a column in Scientific American for many years. I always read it eagerly. I remember well, after perhaps 30 years, his description of how he thought the laws of physics would let him plunge a hand into molten lead without injury.
He said something like (from half a life-time's recollection) "I checked my calculations one final time, and they were correct. I felt a little fear, but trusted science, went ahead - and science was right was right, as I thought it would be."
A test of faith.
Jearl Walker is alive and well. You can see his demonstration of faith repeated here. Do watch.
Remember to spit on your finger before you test your iron!
If you travel back in time to 10th century England and are subjected to trial by ordeal, spitting on you hands won't work of course. I'm not sure what would.
I went out in Spring sun
Came back in Spring rain.
Both equally enjoyable.
I'm not quite prepared.
So Snail you're the one I trust
To carry my cheque up the mountain.
OK I give up. What kind of planet is this?
Please please send rain.
Or at least the seed catalogue.
Last night I accidentally discovered "A Pigeon Sat on a Branch (reflecting on existence)."
I fell in love with the film at once. It's like a series of haiku - snapshots that try to capture the experience of being.
Haiku originated from an earlier tradition of collaborative poetic composition. One of the collaborators would produce a short opening verse - the Hokku - and the others would contribute stanzas one after another to build up a longer poem.
Later the Hokku evolved into a free-standing poetic form, roughly the Haiku as we know it today, but poets still often wrote a sequence of linked Haiku, classically as a travel diary.
"A Pigeon" is a series of loosely connect episodes, some quite fantastic, most deliberately banal, but all inviting us to consider who we are, who others are, and how we relate to one another. Each moves us in one way or another. Yet the situations are all absurd to a greater or lesser degree, which is perhaps true of real life. Many are surreal, and some monstrous.
Foregrounds are simple and actors deadpan, but each scene, like a poem, is ambiguous. It shows us a deeper background we hadn't noticed at first and often adds glimpses of an indifferent external world, sometimes seen through a window.
I've always been obsessed with the way all our small everyday experiences can join together to give us a sense of self and identity. Like Haiku, this film gives an emotional interpretation to this feeling of mine. You might say that all feelings are emotional but I don't think that's exactly correct.
The Marsh Marigold is another spring flower familiar from childhood.
The ones in the photo grow in the stream just across the road from my house, near a little brick bridge which you can see in the photograph.
The flower-name is in the great Oxford English Dictionary. Its earliest known occurrence is from 1578:
The small Celandyne, and the Braue Bassinet, or Marsh Marigold, do grow in moyst medowes.
(Lyte's translation from the original Dutch of Dodoens' Niewe Herball.)
One of my interests is wild flowers. Here a picture I took of celandines outside the front of my house. The celandine is one of my favorite flowers and there are hosts of them where I live.
Not a lot of people know that Wordsworth wrote a poem "The Lesser Celandine" about this flower. Personally I think it's rather dull and I can see why it's less well known than Wordsworth's other flower poem "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud", alias "Daffodils".
Although the latter is one of the most famous poems in the English language it's never really attracted me. I much prefer Herrick's "To Daffodils"
I think that's a beautiful evocation of the transitory nature of things.
Stopping on the bridge tonight.
New moon. New thoughts.
Marie Curie. A person of extraordinary intelligence and courage. On the wall of the British Library is inscribed a quote
Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood.
I've passed it many times, and it always give me a little extra hope, because I am not very brave.
On my calendar
Three boats, 24 houses and 22 ducks.
Why doesn't it hang straight? (It doesn't)
Bumblebee you said it was Spring.
I didn't listen.
Until today.
I'm endlessly fascinated by the relationship between brain function and our sense of self.
Many people who survive a stroke experience apathy. This is usually associated with depression, common amongst stroke survivors. But a minority may have suffered front brain damage that has affected emotional response. The loss may be severe.
In its most profound form, what would this apathy be like? Would it be loss of energy, motivation and interest in everyday life? Would it mean insensitivity to pleasure or pain? The word apathy was made up in the 18th century from the Greek for suffering and meant at first "without suffering", rather than lethargy, which is the way the word is often interpreted today.
It could be closer to the original 18th century sense. Perhaps it is far more than demotivation or joylessness.
Maybe you'd know about emotions intellectually, and even display them, but you'd be acting. Inside there would no emotional experience at all. Not even a gap; just nothing.
Snail, how can I save you in this dark?
Conscience draws me back to help.
Prosper on the other side.
Birdsong makes us happy. Why?
This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.