OU blog

Personal Blogs

This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Barrett & Garrett 2007

Visible to anyone in the world

Interesting point of view regarding e-portfolio systems. Use the web!!

Click here.

Thanks,

Eugene

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 3: 3.2 Recommending an e-portfolio system

Visible to anyone in the world

This task is very relevant to me because at work I am trying, together with 2 other members of the IT-team, to implement an electronical learning environment in which e-portfolio plays an important role.

Target: European School Karlsruhe Secondary School department
System review: Google Apps and My Stuff (Moodle Based)
Recommendation: Google Apps

In today’s day and age there are many e-portfolio systems. Our team has chosen to take a closer look at Google Apps and Moodle. We have done this for several reasons, but the main ones are:

·         Our school is currently using Google Mail as a mail client server, therefore Google Apps seems to be a logical step for using this for e-portfolio purposes.

·         In the past we have looked at Moodle because it can be modified to suit specific needs. My Stuff is a good example of how this e-portfolio system has been molded to suit the needs of the Open University.

·         We have set up some criteria to compare the two e-portfolio systems. This information is attached to this document as appendix 1.

 

Usage in Education
Google Apps exists of Google Docs, Google Talk, Google Calender, Google Mail, Google Groups and Google Reader.

Moodle is a Open Source software product which can be modified to match our own needs (it requires specific knowledge).

Currently, neither Google Apps nor Moodle are being used in the other European Schools. So we would be the first ones using either application.
Schools in Germany tend to use a system which is set up by a local cooperation. In Karlsruhe the LMZ (Landes Media Zentrum) is very active in setting up various LMS systems with e-portfolio possibilities. Their system is too rigid to use in our school system.

Functionality
Google Apps contains various applications which one can use for e-portfolio purposes. In general Google Apps is not set up as an e-portfolio system like My Stuff. My Stuff provides more e-portfolio character than Google Apps does. For example, in My Stuff there is a transcript of achievement and CV’s  (My Stuffbites) which gives students and tutors the possibility to upload their personal achievements. These can then be shared with a specific community. In Google Apps such documents must be made by the students themselves. They can then be shared in the Google Groups Community.

Google also provides various ways of accessing the Google Apps. For example, there is a Google for Educators portal which gives access to various Google Apps or one can access the Apps through iGoogle.

 

At this stage it has become apparent that My Stuff is not an option for our school because we do not have the specific knowledge required to implement it and our budget is too tight to buy this knowledge. The question remains as to whether Google apps can meet our needs.

Students’ use
In Google Apps students are able to share their documents, create their own profile for PDP and have ownership of data (because they have their own Google Account). They would have access to their profile through either the schools website or iGoogle (or Google for Educators). We would prefer to organise the LMS system in such a way that only one log in is required for the students.

Teacher’s use
Teachers can create learner groups by using Google Groups and students then can add files, notes, PowerPoint presentations in their files. Teachers have control over these learner groups they can interact online and have if necessary access to the shared documents. At the moment it would be difficult for me to describe how to assess all of this.

Integration into the European School Karlsruhe
Google Apps will not be hosted from the schools’ sever. Google provides server hosting outside of our school and has its own servers. From a cost point of view this will save us some money.
Google Apps is interoperable with other platforms and allows data migration in two directions(use of Google docs is compatible with Office and Open Office).
Google Apps has an OpenAPI system which interconnects other providers’ websites within the system. This would be very useful as it would enable us to integrate our school website and WebUntis into Google Apps.
Parental Access through Webuntis which can be integrated in Google Apps as it is Open API.

Conclusion
This team recommends Google Apps as a use for e-portfolio. The main reason for this is that Google Apps is part of an integrated learning system (Google for Educators or iGoogle) which can be modified and administrated by its user. We suggest setting up a trial group in our school and seeing whether this projects has the ability to succeed or not.

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 3: 3.1 Understanding e-Portfolio Software

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Saturday, 17 Oct 2009, 16:19

Previous Postings Unit 3:

Google Apps and e-Portfolio

3.1: Understanding e-portfolio Software

3.1: Understanding e-Portfolio Software (a review)

3.1: A Reflection

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 3: 3.1 review of Google Apps & My Stuff

Visible to anyone in the world

Product

Google Apps

My Stuff

Organisation

With iGoogle you can have various Google Applications under one roof. For file repository one can use Google Docs which is compatible with the common Office files. However, large Excel documents tend to upload quite difficultly.

Interesting comments made in the OU forum (inside and outside H808) can be stored by exporting the file into a word document and upload it into Items.. The file repository is different than Google Docs. It is a list of saved documents which are tagged by the drop down menu at the top of the page.  Office compatible documents can be stored very easily.

Blogging

Google provides an aggregator as well. Google Reader is a tool which can be integrated in iGoogle as well. Google Reader gives an overview of the blogs you want to follow. You can share your rss feeds with your contacts (they have to be notified). If you have a Google Blogspot account then it’s very easy to access your blog.

I haven’t found an aggregator in My Stuff. Once logged in the OU VLE you have access to your personal Blog and My Stuff. It is not integrated and as for now My Stuff can’t be used as an aggregator (I haven’t found it)

Sharing

Google reader and Google Docs give the user the opportunity to share saved files, articles, documents and so on. Notification by email and a fellow H808 student can follow your shared items. If in doubt, Google provides a clear tutorial.

My Stuff provides a clear sharing system as well. Once your documents or other stuff are saved, you can easily transfer the files to the shared content (compilation). Click on the people you want to share it with and they receive a notification. I believe they will be guided to your compilation area.

Groups

Google Groups is an application in which one can set up a Group with shared interest pretty quickly and easy. One can create a learning environment with shared members with restricted and shared areas. Invitation by email only and people have to register to have access.

I haven’t come across to create groups in My Stuff. My Stuff provides the members of your tutor group which is set as a group. My fellow H800 students were listed as well. I found this feature very useful.

Ease of Use

iGoogle provides some kind of portal to the Google Apps. All the applications combined together provide a, in my opinion, good e-portfolio

I still have to find my way around My Stuff. The immediate save button in the former OU’s VLE was very useful. Each comment, reflection, article could be stored within one mouse click. Exporting the file into a Word document is useful as well.

Interoperability

Google Apps communicate very well each other. Google Docs is compatible with Office. Other blogs can be followed by reader (making comments on a Blog which isn’t a Google one is difficult)

Files can be exported as Office files, the OU VLE provides access to your OU Blog. I would say it isn’t as interoperable as Google Apps

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 3: 3.1 Understanding e-portfolio software

Visible to anyone in the world

I have looked at the following two applications: Google Apps and My Stuff.

I have worked with iGoogle for a while now and have saved all my H800 and H808 stuff in there. Easy access and other interopearble applications under one roof. What I like about My Stuff is that it is integrated with the OU's VLE. I have now access to my course data, my blog, my instructions and my e-portfolio. However, I use far more applications than this for my learning which I can't import in the OU's VLE...unfortunately.

 

 

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 2: 2.3 e-portfolio Google Apps

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Monday, 5 Oct 2009, 15:02

An overview of how Google Apps can be used as an e-portfolio. Currently I use Google apps as my e-portfolio for H808, this picture below gives a good overview of how it can be used. Overview published by Helen C. Barret Ph.D. and is accessible here.

ePortfolio with Google Apps

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

ePortfolios and authentication

Visible to anyone in the world

The Authentication issue is following me..can't get this issue out of my head. Beetham (2003) paper left me thinking. Anyone experience with authentication within ePortfolios??

Eugene

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 2: 2.1 Europortfolio

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Monday, 28 Sept 2009, 21:05

It looks like an advert. An advert with interesting key points which describes the essence of how a good e-portfolio should be.

A reflection and a summary of my notes:

Aim: e-portfolio needs coordination. In the past many projects were uncoordinated. Europortfolio wants to “engage upon an orchestrated effort involving both educational and corporate institutions to define, design, and develop digital portfolio systems that meet the needs of all stakeholders”.

 

Europortfolio mentions interoperability. From what I’ve read on the forums and the papers so far I am really interested in how this works…to design such an e-portfolio which integrates and communicates with other applications…is there someone who can design a standard for this (xml, html, )..or am I talking nonsense here? Is Europortfolio the answer??

 

“ and encourages the adoption of technical standards that will enable interoperability, between a range of ePortfolio systems and with other information systems. Interoperability will be the key to maximising the number and quality of services offered to ePortfolio owners.

Europortfolio describes its mission and two of the bullet points caught my eye:

 

“ use of the ePortfolio as one of the foundations of a learning economy and society. The link between the different dimensions of learning: individual, organisational, and community learning, based upon a lifelong and life wide repository and celebration of achievements”.

 

 It caught my eye because it wants to integrate the different aspects of learning into one application. Students use, in my experience, more than one application, their own PLE.  Must we store everything in one place? Is this the concept of e-portfolio....one application, many integrated aspects (doc reader, blog reader, curriculum vitae, reflection forms etc. etc.)

 

The other one that caught my eye was:

 

An ePortfolio is a personal digital collection of information describing and illustrating a person's learning, career, experience and achievements. ePortfolios are privately owned and the owner has complete control over who has access to what and when”.

 

This contradicts the Beetham paper in which she says that there should be shared ownership…the learner and the institution; the institution because it can authenticate the information and the learner simply because it concerns them.

 

Interesting….

 

Cheers, Eugene

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Alan Clarke, Monday, 28 Sept 2009, 21:19)
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 2: 2.1 Aalderink & Veugelers (2005)

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Monday, 28 Sept 2009, 21:02

Aalderink and Veugelers (2005) describe a framework for describing and planning e-portfolio implementation.
They make a valid point when they argue that there is an educational shift towards student centered education. The role of the tutor is changing; he becomes a facilitator of learning processes.
Students therefore have to take greater responsibility for their learning, therefore “
students must be supported by a powerful learning environment, in which competences, process steering and co-operation, are the pillars at which the concept of education is build and IT helps meeting their demands”.

The project provided an integrated learning management system (LMS) and an e-portfolio system (N@tschool). 7 Universities in the Netherlands worked together on a toolkit (website) with information and documents to be used at the start of portfolio implementation. Different scenarios are described to carry out the implementation (scenario 1 is not involving all teachers in the implementation process but in scenario 2 they do...the aim is to measure the impact)

Unfortunately they don’t describe the advantages of this approach but I guess the more Universities are involved, the more data become available to evaluate and most of all...can they work towards a system which is inter-exchangeable??

 

Two Universities are highlighted in this paper: Amsterdam University & Windesheim University

Amsterdam
Aim: 40% of the 22000 students should be working with an e-portfolio by 2005.
Processes: making academic training and skills visible in an e-portfolio, collective concept of education and study career counselling.
Approaches:
- Attention for creating a support base / sharing views / involving the context

- A study career-counselling route with checklists for the managers to steer the pilots and new initiatives

- Stimulating and encouraging teachers to grow in their changing role from expert to coach via a professionalization route

 

Windesheim
Approach:  it should be a fundamental cornerstone for the pedagogical process on the one hand and the educational institute’s administrative processes on the other. When implemented in the heart of both, an e-portfolio should make learning and teaching more efficient and effective. It should support and improve students’ acquisition of competencies and it should also bring about and support a more transparent and flexible workflow for the different stakeholders involved”.

In the picture below it is clear to see how the e-portfolio has a central role in student’s processes:

 Aalderink & Veugelers 2005

They continue to describe various challenges which both Universities have experienced along the way, the one that caught my eye was the one about the conditions of the technology used in the implementing process: “In most cases e-portfolio is not just a single tool (one piece of software), it is more often part of a larger technical configuration, in which the required functionality may be met by the interoperation of different hard- and software tools.”.

I believe the issue of various different systems operating with each other is raised here as well…

 

Conclusion: “Together the models, cases and examples described above make it clear that ‘folio thinking’ is and will remain a strong trend for the coming years in the Netherlands. It is at the same time a result of and a stimulus for both the development and implementation of e-learning and that of pedagogical change across educational sectors and potentially also through working life of our citizens”.

 

All together an interesting paper if you want to know how to implement an e-portfolio system. Personally I would like to know more about how exactly e-portfolio systems are benefitting students’ educational careers. Does it have an effect on their learning? Most of all, who are we to decide that an e-portfolio is useful for students’ future…..just questions that popped up whilst reading this paper.
I guess I still have a lot to learn about this subject.

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 1: 1.3 & 1.4 My use of technology

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Thursday, 10 Sept 2009, 17:16

In H800 we had to make an overview of my PLE which you can find here
These are the technologies I'm currently using.

For my study I use iGoole as my main account for Blogging and reading others' blogs. I find iGoogle a very useful tool because as soon as you open your account you get an overview of all your used applications. In my case this is: Google Calender (a shared calender with my class parents and students), Google Mail, Google Groups (virtual environment for my different classes), Blogs and Google Reader (aggregator for reading blogs).

For my e-portfolio (storing evidence) I use Google docs and Office Live. Lately I use Office live more often than Google Docs because I use quite a lot of Excel files which are not really compatible (IMHO) with google docs. I store my written work for the OU course and I have stored all my work files (worksheets, planning, time tables etc). I can share these documents with others as well but I have to invite them first and on the receiving end one has to create an account (same as with Google Docs).

For Blogging I use various accounts (all stored in Google Reader). For the OU I use my OU blog which is quite simple, but it does the job. I mainly write my personal reflections about what's keeping me busy during the course. This can be either personal notes and/or reflections regarding articles we have to read. When I write my TMA's I look back on what I've written, what kind of responses I've had. I also store interesting comments or blog posts in my iGoogle account (shared documents) which I also use for my TMA's.
On a personal level I also have a cycling log in which I write reviews about various cycle routes throughout Europe. I also have a class blog, where my primary students write about their schooltrips (protected area).

Favourite links, websites, articles and other stuff I find intersting, are saved in my Delicious account. I tag all my files to create an overview of my pile of links. I find this most useful especially when you are part of a network and see what others are saving. Sometimes I start searching for documents in Delicious first. Another interesting fact is the way people are tagging. For me this is quite often a learning experience, to see how other people are using specific keywords.

I have stored all my documents on the net (backup on a mobile hdd) except for my bankdetails and private details. I have no documents left on my laptop or computer anymore.

Currently I'm trying to experiment with "My Stuff" as well. Looks promising. I have to figure out all the different possibilities though. I quite like the "save" buton which directly saves interesting articles, video and comments into "My Stuff". I find this very usefull. I used to copy and paste interesting material into a Word document and then save it in Google Docs or Office Live. This is a fairly quicker way!

I'm wondering if anyone else uses other applications as well? Eportfolios, blogging, storing and sharing...I find this most interesting and above all very useful in my professional, student and private life.

Cheers, Eugene

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Tim Musgrave, Saturday, 12 Sept 2009, 05:12)
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 242388