OU blog

Personal Blogs

neil

results

Visible to anyone in the world

and not good ones. Still...

 

Permalink 6 comments (latest comment by ROSIE Rushton-Stone, Thursday, 29 Nov 2012, 18:53)
Share post
neil

post mortem

Visible to anyone in the world
Of my exams.
Permalink 5 comments (latest comment by Neil Anderson, Friday, 19 Oct 2012, 19:47)
Share post
neil

messing around

Visible to anyone in the world

Reading blogs. I really should get down to some work, I will in a while...

There's a bit of me that's thinking, "bit late now". In the sane bit of my bonce I know that this isn't true. In fact it's rubbish.

Some work on surfaces tonight and a lot of practice questions tomorrow will be worth ten to fifteen marks.

I did a few old TMA questions today at work [actually I've been doing this for the last few shifts]. Not too bad. I ran into a few issues: dense? nowhere dense? what does that mean? Still, my speed and, surprisingly, accuracy were good for some types of question.

Unless the paper sucks I see three questions in part A and one in part B that I should be able to answer in three-quarters of an hour—40 marks. There then should be a fractal question that I should be able to do in about a quarter of an hour—another 8 marks. Remove 6 marks for sloppiness.

Then, I'm guessing that there will be two part A questions on surfaces that will be a bit fiddly—but possible. These I'll practice hard tomorrow, let's say three-quarters of an hour and 12 marks with sloppiness tax.

Where are we? Time left: an hour and a quarter. Marks got: 54. Marks left: 32.

Now I need to tackle the second part B question. I'm either going to have to show that something is a metric space, or it's a topological space [alongside stuff about compact/connected/complete], I'll practice this tomorrow. Say three-quarters of an hour and 8 marks.

Then I have half an hour to tackle two questions worth sixteen marks with 6 marks required for 70. And a grade 2!! Surely I can muddle through...?

I'm going to, for once, be firmly disciplined about this. The exam is going to be tackled in exactly the above way. What we don't want is a repeat of last year's panic. I need to tackle the questions that I know that I can do before I move onto anything that can trip me up head-wise.

The above seems very rational, did I write it? [And it could all fall to bits if lots of questions that I don't expect appear.]

Time for some surfaces methinks...

 

What

Permalink 6 comments (latest comment by Susan Whelan, Tuesday, 9 Oct 2012, 01:46)
Share post
neil

ok

Visible to anyone in the world

This is it — the final push. Finish work at two, home, nap and then the final surface unit. Tomorrow there are three or four questions that I need to revise. After that it's just the exam.

And then of course it's the groups...

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Sheena Bradley, Monday, 8 Oct 2012, 11:28)
Share post
neil

revision time again

Visible to anyone in the world
And some thoughts about where and if it all went wrong.
Permalink Add your comment
Share post
neil

i caved

Visible to anyone in the world

I read a number theory unit in the bath today, and I suspect that it will be bedtime reading tonight.

I don't suppose that this is too dire—it is maths.

For now it's back to the fractals...

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
neil

back-shift

Visible to anyone in the world
Revision woes, or not.
Permalink Add your comment
Share post
neil

i'll never be a mathematician

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Neil Anderson, Sunday, 30 Sep 2012, 20:40

I'm too sloppy.

Yesterday I went to my topology tutorial, which gave me a lot of hope. Nothing was exterior to the closure of the open ball that is my understanding zone [wee topology-joke there].

Afterwards we went to the pub and chatted stuff, then, wonderfully, Ford and his M209ers arrived. I needed to head home but I imagine that much talking and drinking happened after I'd left. I certainly hope so.

Today I bracketed about five hours of revision around a couple of hours of walking to-and-from my school and putting away exam desks.

There was much mumbling about sequences in topological spaces going on during this work-walk process—I still don't get these, I suspect that I'm missing something obvious.

So sloppy?

I started some solitaire stuff the other day. What I posted isn't wrong, the topology is probably the right one, nothing I say is an outright lie. But in every other way it is wrong.

As I work my way through the books I notice the, slightly, wrong assumptions that I have made along the way. Sloppy.

As soon as I thought about how I would code it I saw where I had gone wrong. I'll leave the tripe that I wrote-up up, but I'm going to have take some time to think about this.

[For affecionados I created a topological space that wasn't Hausdorff, so it couldn't be a metric space. And yet I wanted a metric.

I think that this is the right topological space to consider, we just have to forget about a metric. A metric which is difficult anyway.]

Permalink Add your comment
Share post
neil

future, past

Visible to anyone in the world
Some thoughts about today and tomorrow and some stuff about solitaire.
Permalink Add your comment
Share post
neil

revision

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Neil Anderson, Tuesday, 25 Sep 2012, 21:48
Doing it my way.
Permalink Add your comment
Share post
neil

in which we decide

Visible to anyone in the world
I've been reading a biography of Steve Jobs and it's having an effect on me. You should struggle for perfection, in your own way.
Permalink Add your comment
Share post
neil

again knackered

Visible to anyone in the world

Four hours of topology, coming slowly but I have hope.

It's amazing the amount of wee subtleties that I missed first time round. Re-reading the first units has started to make some of the stuff that bothered me in the later units gel.

Tomorrow is going to be a hellish day, big split shift: start at six in the morning finish at midnight and then back to work for eight the next morning. It isn't that that's really bothering me, I've dealt with that before. Tomorrow Danny is taken from me. He is now surplus.

He'll go to green-pastures new, I hope he'll be happy. Still, life will not be the same without him. We enjoyed and supported each others weaknesses, we appreciated each others strengths, we had a laugh.

He is almost all of the reason that I've been able to cope this year when I so didn't last year. We could always lean on each other.

I know we'll stay in touch but we might never work together again. I've loved many people, few to none have I ever enjoyed working with.

 

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Sheena Bradley, Friday, 21 Sep 2012, 08:18)
Share post
neil

too much

Visible to anyone in the world

Today I've worked an early shift, watched a Morse [the one in Italy] and I'v've done three hours of topology revision. Which is more than enough for anybody who is even approaching normally-human basic.

I'm just re-reading the unit texts, surprisingly this has gone well. I'm now grokking some of the stuff that hadn't gone into the meatware the first time round. I'm starting to get a feel for the tools available and what it is that we are trying to achieve. [Although I'm unsure as to what we do achieve, the course just peters out.]

I had my first squatch at the specimen paper today—didn't really like. What worries me is that I'm unversed in the 'dark arts' of the maths game. In the exam you need to be able to mash symbols and know the ways that you need to be mashing them without thought. I plan to practice but time is tight.

The groups course needs to be worked at too. I intend to avoid the tilings/wallpaper/lattices twaddle. I just won't have the time. Besides I like groups, I'll treat it as an amuse bush when I'm too mind-wiped for topology.

I might get through this.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Salma Khatun, Wednesday, 19 Sep 2012, 22:24)
Share post
neil

in which

Visible to anyone in the world
I admit to making a mistake, maybe.
Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Neil Anderson, Friday, 7 Sep 2012, 16:33)
Share post
neil

according to my records

Visible to anyone in the world

It's been over a month since I did any groups & geometry stuff. Given that I have a TMA due in under ten days, and I haven't read any of the units, this would seem to be a problem.

Well not so much.

According to the assessment calculator I need twenty marks [out of a hundred] to have an OCAS > 70. Each unit text has a related question of twenty-five marks => two units will do the job. It's groups and I have enough days. I can ignore the geometry s&^%e.

It's not as if I can make a 1 in the exam anyway.

To some of you this type of thinking may seem wrong, shouldn't I try my hardest?

I will try my hardest but I'll try my hardest where it will do the most good. I need to spend my time on topology. If only because I love it the most. [Although I moan about it.]

I won't get a 1 on topology and I'll be lucky if I get a 3 for the groups. Still, I know that I'm right: focused effort.

At some point in your OU career, dear reader, you will be faced with the same problem. Save what you can.

Oh, and do the stuff that you like...

 

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Bren P, Monday, 3 Sep 2012, 08:34)
Share post
neil

in which i go

Visible to anyone in the world
batcrap mad
Permalink 5 comments (latest comment by Chris FInlay, Monday, 3 Sep 2012, 21:22)
Share post
neil

tomorrow

Visible to anyone in the world

Thirty-one marks to get, one unit book to read, and this is topology.

Still I have an advantage, I can sit in the work-library all day, my boys will fend off anything that doesn't totally need me, not many people can do OU stuff at work. Why can I do this?

I'm not going to answer that.

Still, tomorrow will be hard day in, what seems to be, a life of hard days. What!. None of us here are stupid, we signed up for a life of hard days.

It's time I got back to computing, which seems simpler, until I actually tackle it

Still I've found a song to dance to when my TMA is off in the post. I can't find a good online version—still it's interesting. One pill makes you larger, one pill makes you small. What you aren't saying is anything about the topological invariants. Jings you don't even give us a proper metric?

Whatever...

 

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Marcus Becker, Thursday, 30 Aug 2012, 11:27)
Share post
neil

controvesial

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Neil Anderson, Tuesday, 28 Aug 2012, 21:08

[I'm tired, I should be writing this for the nonsense but I can't be bothered schleping HTML tonight. So you're stuck with my tripe here. It will be nonsense to most. Perhaps to all?]

The toplogy TMA will not be finished; one and a half units/questions undone, and the thing to be posted by 17:30 Thursday—not going to happen.

Tonight I managed thirteen of the hardest marks that I may never get. Still I had a light-bulb moment. [This is a live TMA so I'm going to obfuscate this.]

For some reason I thought that I could manage a proof-by-contradiction (sometimes I can) after a while I realized that, while I was right, [I knew that from the way the question was worded] this wasn't going to work out. Where to now?

That's the problem with topology—the tool kit is too big. And you don't know what some of the tools are really for. And you often pick the wrong tool.

For example, tonight I needed to show that some set in some space was bounded, that would be the General Extreme Value theorem then? No! that says that something entirely different. So ... what? Monotone convergenge, that isn't even listed in the hand book ... do I really need to show that this is bounded?

People who know this stuff will guess the method that I used. Weierstrass and his ilk may have been the rightest of the right but they have blown the brains of generations of undergrads. Maybe that's our due?

When this course finishes I won't be walking away from topology. This course has been too-far too-fast but I've always seen maths as a girl...a girl like me, a girl who likes me.

And...

 

Permalink 7 comments (latest comment by Neil Anderson, Wednesday, 29 Aug 2012, 20:35)
Share post
neil

uniform convergence

Visible to anyone in the world

of sequences of functions.

Cauchy made a mistake that was spotted by Abel. Simple stuff then?

Which is why at five in the am I'm lying in my pit fretting.

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Marcus Becker, Sunday, 26 Aug 2012, 11:10)
Share post
neil

long day...

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Neil Anderson, Saturday, 25 Aug 2012, 21:13

of topology.

And you know what? I'm happy. Some of the solutions that I've produced today are the best solutions that I've ever produced. [I think, we'll see]

Usually I'm a four-page answer type-of guy. Today I've rarely gone beyond a single page, even for seven marks.

I could be utterly wrong. Actually I couldn't; I could be wrong, but when it comes to maths I can no longer be utterly wrong.

Jings. What have I just said?

If I have scored every mark, I have fifty. I have less than a week to do what took me a month.

The funny thing is that I think that this is possible.

 

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Neil Anderson, Sunday, 26 Aug 2012, 06:36)
Share post
neil

three more marks

Visible to anyone in the world
nada
Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Neil Anderson, Tuesday, 21 Aug 2012, 21:05)
Share post
neil

that's odd

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Neil Anderson, Monday, 20 Aug 2012, 23:03

I was working my way through uniform convergent/point convergent sequences of functions. We don't seem to care what space we are in any more. My brain is beyond hurt with thinking. Then I saw something. I played a few games of solitaire and I think that I'm right.

There comes a point place when you can remove enough pegs so that a single peg finish isn't possible any more. I can't prove this but there's some limit condition here I'm sure. I'd love to know where that place is. Which might mean that there is always a point convergent sequence of functions under a certain limit? Mmmmm.

Dammit neil, build that app properly! It's not as if you haven't had years and years to do so.

Jumping, jumping, Neo. Still I have a shining new tool for my toolbox. And my personal madness is burning bright once again.

 

Permalink 8 comments (latest comment by Neil Anderson, Sunday, 26 Aug 2012, 05:20)
Share post
neil

topology

Visible to anyone in the world

Today I cut back the bushes around my house and wrote a long rambling article about how topology might be applied to solitaire. Fortunately before I posted my crap Doctor Sheldon Cooper intervened.

Cooper is an idiot-savant. I'm far worse; I'm just an idiot. I saw I might be talking shite.

My problem is that I think I'll be taken seriously, like that's going to happen. One of the most important duties of mine mind is to remind myself how small I am.

Shoot me with whatever you have, if I ever pretend to understand anything, ever again.

I've almost lost the plot of the why I'm doing this, this OU stuff, it seems so hard.

I will win, somehow.

Permalink 5 comments (latest comment by Neil Anderson, Monday, 20 Aug 2012, 20:52)
Share post
neil

night thoughts

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Neil Anderson, Sunday, 19 Aug 2012, 02:34

I woke with the sudden realization that I'd been missing something important. As we walked to last Saturday's tutorial Graham said something along the lines of, "...or you create your own internal words for...".

Which is something that I usually do, but haven't been doing lately. What does that mean?

Permalink 2 comments (latest comment by Susan Whelan, Sunday, 19 Aug 2012, 13:45)
Share post
neil

borkked

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Neil Anderson, Saturday, 18 Aug 2012, 17:02

A couple of posts that expose my madness. Although I prefer to see it as your classic British eccentricity.

[You need to scroll up to see the first one—I've messed something up there.]

Permalink Add your comment
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 252610