OU blog

Personal Blogs

This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Unit 1: 1.3 & 1.4 My use of technology

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Thursday, 10 Sept 2009, 17:16

In H800 we had to make an overview of my PLE which you can find here
These are the technologies I'm currently using.

For my study I use iGoole as my main account for Blogging and reading others' blogs. I find iGoogle a very useful tool because as soon as you open your account you get an overview of all your used applications. In my case this is: Google Calender (a shared calender with my class parents and students), Google Mail, Google Groups (virtual environment for my different classes), Blogs and Google Reader (aggregator for reading blogs).

For my e-portfolio (storing evidence) I use Google docs and Office Live. Lately I use Office live more often than Google Docs because I use quite a lot of Excel files which are not really compatible (IMHO) with google docs. I store my written work for the OU course and I have stored all my work files (worksheets, planning, time tables etc). I can share these documents with others as well but I have to invite them first and on the receiving end one has to create an account (same as with Google Docs).

For Blogging I use various accounts (all stored in Google Reader). For the OU I use my OU blog which is quite simple, but it does the job. I mainly write my personal reflections about what's keeping me busy during the course. This can be either personal notes and/or reflections regarding articles we have to read. When I write my TMA's I look back on what I've written, what kind of responses I've had. I also store interesting comments or blog posts in my iGoogle account (shared documents) which I also use for my TMA's.
On a personal level I also have a cycling log in which I write reviews about various cycle routes throughout Europe. I also have a class blog, where my primary students write about their schooltrips (protected area).

Favourite links, websites, articles and other stuff I find intersting, are saved in my Delicious account. I tag all my files to create an overview of my pile of links. I find this most useful especially when you are part of a network and see what others are saving. Sometimes I start searching for documents in Delicious first. Another interesting fact is the way people are tagging. For me this is quite often a learning experience, to see how other people are using specific keywords.

I have stored all my documents on the net (backup on a mobile hdd) except for my bankdetails and private details. I have no documents left on my laptop or computer anymore.

Currently I'm trying to experiment with "My Stuff" as well. Looks promising. I have to figure out all the different possibilities though. I quite like the "save" buton which directly saves interesting articles, video and comments into "My Stuff". I find this very usefull. I used to copy and paste interesting material into a Word document and then save it in Google Docs or Office Live. This is a fairly quicker way!

I'm wondering if anyone else uses other applications as well? Eportfolios, blogging, storing and sharing...I find this most interesting and above all very useful in my professional, student and private life.

Cheers, Eugene

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Tim Musgrave, Saturday, 12 Sept 2009, 05:12)
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 22: 2F PLE'S and where you think they are heading

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Thursday, 16 July 2009, 10:09

I summarise what I’ve written before in previous blogs, but then structured this according to task 2f:

How do the various arguments align with your own experience?
I understand the Universities’ point of view that a VLE provides control. Tools from outside, integrated in a central organised VLE provide a clear overview of what students learn (course content), how they interact (forum, blog, elluminate) and how they collaborate (wiki). As a learner this structure helped me to start my first online course properly.  I would have been lost if it had just been me and a large selection of internet tools and I simply had to find out which ones would be best for which purpose. I favour Sclater’s (and Weller’s) argument that a default environment makes it clear to the students which tools are needed and in which environment. The OU clearly uses this method as they assigned Delicious to us as an example of Social Networking. There are numerous other applications (Digg, EduTagger etc) that we could have used but we had to work with Delicious. It gave us an idea how to work with these tools in general and now we have these skills can choose our own. For me this approach worked well.
I strongly agree with Weller’s opinion that the Tools on the web need to be used. Learning by using is one of my slogans as well.


Are you broadly in favour of PLEs/use of Web 2.0 in an educational context?
I am in favour of using PLEs and web 2.0 tools in an educational context. One can find numerous tools  on the internet which suits my needs and certainly  the needs of others as well. However, I agree with Sclater that there has to be some kind of default tool which we all use in order to communicate with each other. My experiences with University VLE’S are limited to the OU’s LMS. I like the set up, although I hadn’t initially realised, that the OU used a Moodle based VLE and made it their own. The OU certainly transformed it to ensure the VLE meets their demands and makes it possible to use web 2.0 tools in a controlled environment.

I believe that VLE’s are there as some sort of safety net. They ensure that all students and tutors achieve a baseline level  in working with web 2.0 tools and it is then up to the individual to decide how much further they want to take it.

Using my PLE in a default environment would be the perfect solution for me. We can’t deny the existence of the PLEs and tools outside the VLE’s. Why don’t we bring them together? I therefore agree with Paul Coulthard’s comment on his blog where he says that he prefers a mixture of a VLE and a PLE: “....but one that would still not address those learners who do not embrace Web 2.0 technologies or those students who choose to separate the social use of them from their educational use.”

Or do you foresee a number of issues and problems?
Although I favour the use of PLEs and web 2.0 tools in education, I also foresee some problems or difficulties. Technology develops in a fast pace and for tutors/staff/teachers it might be difficult to keep up with the latest tools. If there isn’t a default environment, the divide amongst those who are able to use this technology and those who aren’t will continue to grow.
Another issue raised by  Sclater was the difficulty of assessing students. It would be difficult to assess students if they all use different tools. However, I strongly agreed with Weller that Universities and educational institutions should review their ways of assessments. Wouldn’t it be better if we assess processes alongside end results?  Isn’t it better to assess how one contributes in addition to what one contributes instead of carrying out the same assessments as 20 years ago with today’s technology? I believe this would be a true reformation and a huge step forward.

To conclude, I am in favour of a controlled environment to introduce learners to technology where necessary, and support many of Sclater’s opinions, but my own use of web 2.0 tools outside the OU’S VLE proves that I look for tools which suit my needs.  Somehow I try to integrate this into my study and into my tasks. I use it alongside the OU’s VLE but as well for pleasure and personal persuits.

Permalink 1 comment (latest comment by Nathan Lomax, Thursday, 16 July 2009, 21:45)
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 21 & 22: Activity 1D Technology in our Organisation: Part 3 & 4

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Wednesday, 8 July 2009, 21:06

Part 3&4 are about the implications for teachers:

Part 3:
Conole says on page 9 that the implications for teachers and others are less radical. She continues on page 10 to mention the fact that lack of participation by staff members in peer networks: “... students are in peer networks. The same is not true for academics; currently the majority of teachers are not connected in this way and hence the potential benefits of such networks are not apparent to them. Participation in the blogosphere or via microblogging services such as twitter or immersion in 3D-worlds such as second life, only have true value if others are contributing and if what they are saying is of interest to you as an individual, i.e. if it adds value to your practice. Academics currently struggle to see the practical benefits of these tools, being overwhelmed by the sheer quantity and potential possibilities and intimidated by the fact that incorporation of these new approaches will require a fundamental change in their role as ‘teacher’ and associated lose of authority.”

This is quite true I’m afraid. In our school the majority of teachers are not participating in peer networks and therefore gain no new knowledge. The most frequently heard argument is that they are afraid of violation of privacy. In my opinion it is the fear of using new technology because they haven’t experienced it yet.  I participate in a couple of peer networks for teachers in which one shares knowledge, materials and even problems. It is quite interesting and very different to other social network sites. A good example of an English version is the following website: http://teachade.com/

Part4:
How do we get teachers to be less afraid of web 2.0?  Perhaps we have to provide opportunity for them to participate and experience web 2.0, facilitate proper training and then give them a gentle push over the edge!
I have found, in my opinion, a very good website that helps people to get acquainted with web 2.0 tools. It is a an online learning program by the California School Library Association 2.0 team
http://classroomlearning2.blogspot.com/

It presents a very good example of bringing web 2.0 INTO the classroom. What is also important to note is that as a teacher, you can train yourself in your own pace and time!

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 21 & 22: Activity 1D Technology in our Organisation: Part 2

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Wednesday, 8 July 2009, 21:05

Part 2 is about the barriers in our Organisation

Part 2
There are however, some barriers in our school when it comes to technology. Conoly made the following statement in her article: “The minority who are facing a frustrating battle trying to convince their colleagues of the importance and impact of these new technologies, finding themselves arguing against outdated arguments and concepts about technologies which relate to the way things used to be and have little or nothing to do with the reality of today’s digital environment.” People in our school tend to look back and compare with the past instead of looking at today & tomorrow, or instead of engaging critically in the discussion and seeing what is useful or not, they do not compare at all!!

Our school website, for example, needs to be updated. It was designed in a typical web 1.0 environment in which people are only consuming the information. The ICT co-ordinators want to make it more interactive and want the school community to be able to participate more in it. We believe that web 2.0 can provide us with the proper tools to do this: blogs, wiki’s and video sharing.

I have found a pretty good example of a school that has already done this: http://www.scuola3d.eu/index.php?t=1
Our school has the ideas, a survey has been done to find out what the community wants and now we have to look for the right company to build our website.

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 21 & 22: Activity 1D Technology in our Organisation: Part 1

Visible to anyone in the world
Edited by Eugene Voorneman, Friday, 31 July 2009, 16:52

Hi All,

These are my notes for assigment 1D with the Conole paper integrated and some web 2.0 websites or tools that are relevant to me. I have split my notes up in 4 parts otherwise this Blog Post is much too long. Enjoy reading and feel free to comment.

Part 1
Since 2002 our school organisation has made a massive shift in its use technology. It was the first year we had a proper ICT Budget and at last we could invest in our IT structure. We set up our school network and connected the kindergarten, primary school, secondary school and the administration department to it. Since then our school has changed drastically and become almost fully digitalised. (There are now computers in classrooms, IT rooms, smartboards, an email system, online admin tools, a website, digital video cameras, photo cameras, use of software in class, digital assessments, a digital follow up system, digital reports and the use of Office as a standard in our school)
In the same way that Conole described in her article, there were a couple of triggers that forced our school to make a swift change in its use of technology.  The triggers were the increasing use of internet and email, the sheer development of Windows based PC’S (we had old Macintosh computers) and the continuous development of our direct competitors (International Schools in the area).
I would conclude that up until 2005 we made good progress, but then things seemed to plateau. However, the current use of web 2.0 based applications by students and some teachers are triggers for our school to take the next step in IT development: creating an online or electronic environment to communicate with students (Moodle, StudyWiz) and installing Wi-Fi in our school to provide more teaching facilities for staff members and the use of laptops in school by students.

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 19, activity 4 Mobile 2.0

Visible to anyone in the world
  1. How, specifically, are you bringing or might you bring Mobile 2.0 into your own learning and/or teaching – using that latter term broadly to include support of various kinds?
    In my opinion Mobile 2.0 will be used outside tradition learning spaces. As a learner I am already using my smart phone to either upload my blog or check my tweets and check forum messages. I am learning when it suites me (either when I’m traveling or when I’m somewhere where I think I would rather be learning).
    I’m not sure at the moment how I would use it in teaching. As I have mentioned before, next week I am on a GPS day trip with my class. This will be the first time that I’ll be using a proper mobile device in teaching.
    At the moment I don’t see how I can use mobile phones or smart phones into my class. I already use laptops into my class, but its purpose isn’t mobility, but flexibility. With the laptop they can sit outside of the computer area and work at their table. That is as far as mobile devices are being present in my class room.

  2. How far does this involve using and accommodating learners’ existing practices, and how far does it involve them in adopting new practices or new devices?

Students in my class already use quite a number of mobile devices. Laptops, for example, aren’t new to them. When I introduced the laptops to them they were excited because they knew the devices from their own experience. They worked with it immediately. My assignments might differ from its usage at home. In that perspective it might be a new experience for them.

  1. How far, if at all, would any new practices/devices affect a sense of ‘ownership’ – the practitioners’ and/or yours?
    I am not able to answer this as I don’t have any proper experience in this field. I like the quote from Irvine (2008) though: “it’s My Space and not Your Space, adults are told”.
    I believe that students don’t see the potential yet of how “their” devices can be used in learning. They will not notice the learning moment: the students from the Spanish teacher hadn’t realised that they were actually doing some assignments. They thought it was a personal thing.

 

  1. When you read the interview data from the six practitioners – see the section headed ‘Experienced practitioners’ mobile practices’ – do you recognise the picture conveyed there? How far do mobile devices blur the distinction between personal and professional areas of your own life? Do you have a view on whether this is desirable?

Yes I do recognise the picture here. My netbook is provided by my employer. I use it for my work but I use it at home as well. It is connected to my personal network at home and I use it as an extension of my home laptop. I use basically all of my mobile devices on a professional and personal base.
However I have separate Flickr accounts; one private and a personal one. My Delicious account is used everything: personal, pleasure, learning, teaching. I’m organising my favorites by tags.

Cheers,

Eugene

Permalink
Share post
This is me, Eugene Voorneman.

Week 19, activity 2

Visible to anyone in the world

1. The various interviewees in the paper – Interviewee A, B, C, etc. – whose account do you find most interesting, or most relevant to your own personal or professional life, and why? You could start at the section headed ‘Interview data’ about half-way through the paper.

- Interviewee E’s experiences are quite similar to my own when I had just bought my Smartphone: I used to look up specific pages for my phone. Nowadays, pages automatically switch over to so called PDA sites, so you don’t have to look for them anymore.

- Interviewee B and his PDA: I am never without it. I think Smart phones have replaced PDA’S at the moment. I am never without my smart phone. I have all my data stored in it: agenda, meetings, lesson planning, music, email addresses, phone numbers, addresses...

- I was also interested in interviewee I (teacher of Spanish) and his idea to integrate a school trip into his lesson by using mobile phones and text messages.

At the moment I don’t use any mobile devices as a learning tool unless Senteo counts as a mobile device (it can only be used with Smart Boards though, so I guess it doesn’t count as one)

2. Where would you place your own use of mobile devices in comparison with those of the alumni in the paper above? I don’t mean, ‘Do you do more than them, or less?’ After all, they varied considerably. But what are the similarities and differences, and is this connected with the fact that the data for the paper was gathered in 2005?

I do believe that some percentages may have varied lately in comparison with the research. Mobile phone companies have certainly changed their contracts. Flatrates, sms-bundles, data bundles etc. It has become cheaper to access the internet and I have to say with a reasonable speed. I use my smartphone (A Nokia E90) for almost everything: access the internet, using the OU forum and put my tweets on twitter, text messaging and even blogging.

So there might be a difference in usage at this moment. Even the use of laptops might have decreased. I know that I use my netbook more often (as it is lighter and easier to carry).

3. Which areas would you explore if you were carrying out research into mobile practices now?

- Use of Mobile Devices for accessing social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook. Are people purchasing mobile devices because they offer the possibility to access social network applications and this is seen to be "cool", or are people purchasing them because the really do want to use them for this purpose?

- Is the netbook really replacing the laptop and has it potential to become a standardised learning tool?

Cheers,

Eugene

 

Permalink
Share post

This blog might contain posts that are only visible to logged-in users, or where only logged-in users can comment. If you have an account on the system, please log in for full access.

Total visits to this blog: 242392